Preview

Bulletin of Siberian Medicine

Advanced search

Macrophages and tumor progression: on the way to macrophage-specific therapy

https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-4-61-74

Abstract

According to the current paradigm proposed by Piter Novell [1], carcinogenesis is a process of clonal evolution in which consequent cycles of clonal selection in the adaptive tissue microenvironment give rise to tumors with a variety of genetic and other molecular changes determining the biological behavior of each individual tumor. Selection of clones with different properties provides heterogeneity of cancer cells within one tumor and thus results in a low effectiveness of chemotherapy.

On the average, only 40–60% of cancer patients respond to chemotherapy, and even in the case of complete regression, there is a high probability of tumor recurrence [2, 3]. Increasing the effectiveness of solid tumor therapy and reducing the possibility of recurrence requires not only the use of optimal individual schemes of therapy for each patient, but also the development of combined approaches aimed at both the destruction of tumor cells and antitumor programming of the microenvironment, where immune cells plays a prominent regulatory role. The key cells of the immune system that determine the relationship between tumor cells and the microenvironment, from early stages of tumor growth, including the regulation of neoangiogenesis, and to terminal stage of dissemination of malignant process, are tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) [4– 6]. Identification of the pathways responsible for the tumor-supporting function of macrophages makes it possible to develop therapeutic approaches combining chemotherapy with the macrophage blocking strategy. Inhibition of macrophage infiltration into tumor, their removal with anti-macrophagal agents, and switching off the function of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor can be the macrophage blocking tools. Approaches of simultaneous alteration of cancer stem cells and TAM to abolish chemoresistance and inhibit tumor progression are promising. Strategies for reprogramming of macrophages to switch off towards the antitumor phenotype are developing.

Thus, an extremely wide range of regulatory and effector activity and high functional plasticity of macrophages promise the development of macrophage-targeted therapeutic agents to modulate relationships between tumor and microenvironment to prevent the tumor progression. 

About the Authors

N. V. Cherdyntseva
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS); National Research Tomsk State University (NR TSU)
Russian Federation

5, Per. Kooperativny, Tomsk, 634050

36, Lenina Av., Tomsk, 634050



I. V. Mitrofanova
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS); National Research Tomsk State University (NR TSU)
Russian Federation

5, Per. Kooperativny, Tomsk, 634050

36, Lenina Av., Tomsk, 634050



M. A. Buldakov
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS); National Research Tomsk State University (NR TSU)
Russian Federation

5, Per. Kooperativny, Tomsk, 634050

36, Lenina Av., Tomsk, 634050



M. N. Stakheeva
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS)
Russian Federation
5, Per. Kooperativny, Tomsk, 634050


M. R. Patysheva
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS)
Russian Federation
5, Per. Kooperativny, Tomsk, 634050


M. V. Zavjalova
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS); Siberian Medical State University
Russian Federation

5, Per. Kooperativny, Tomsk, 634050

2, Moskov Tract, Tomsk, 634050



J. G. Kzhyshkowska
National Research Tomsk State University (NR TSU); University of Heidelberg
Russian Federation

36, Lenina Av., Tomsk, 634050

1-3, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer, Mannheim, 68167



References

1. Nowell P.C. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations // Science. 1976; 194 (4260): 23–28. DOI: 10.1126/ science.959840.

2. Greaves M., Maley C.C. Clonal evolution in cancer // Nature. 2012; 481 (7381): 306–313. DOI: 10.1038/nature10762.

3. Bhatia S., Frangioni J.V., Hoffman R.M., Iafrate A.J., Polyak K. The challenges posed by cancer heterogeneity // Nat. Biotechnol. 2012; 30 (7): 604–610. DOI: 10.1038/ nbt.2294.

4. Mantovani A., Germano G., Marchesi F., Locatelli M., Biswas S.K. Cancer-promotin tumor-associated macrophages: new vistas and open questions // Eur. J. Immuno. 2011; 41 (9): 2522–2525. DOI:10.1002/eji.201141894.

5. Pollard J.W. Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis // Nature Reviews Cancer. 2004; 4: 71–78. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1256.

6. Qian B.Z., Pollard J.W. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis // Cell. 2010; 141: 39– 51. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.014.

7. Ferlay J., Shin H.R., Bray F., Forman D., Mathers C., Parkin D.M. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 // Int. J. Cancer. 2010; 127 (12): 2893–2917. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25516.

8. Thomas F., Fisher D., Fort P. et al. Applying ecological and evolutionary theory to cancer: a long and winding road // Evol. Appl. 2013; 6 (1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/ eva.12021.

9. Keogh B. Era of Personalized Medicine May Herald End of Soaring Cancer Costs // Oxford J. Medicine & Health JNCI. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012; 104 (1): 12–17.

10. Напалков Н.П. Рак и демографический переход // Вопросы онкологии. 2004; 50 (2): 127–144. Napalkov N.P. Rak I demographicheskii perekhod [Cancer and demographic transition] // Voprosy onkologii. 2004; 50 (2): 127–144 (in Russian).

11. Кжышковска Ю.Г., Митрофанова И.В., Завьяло- ва М.В., Слонимская Е.М., Чердынцева Н.В. Опухо- леассоциированные макрофаги. М.: Наука, 2017: 224. Kzhyshkowska J.G., Mitrofanova I.V., Zavyalova M.V., Slonimskaya E.M., Cherdyntseva N.V. Opucholeassociirovannye makrofagi [Tumor-associated macrophages]. Moscow: Nauka Publ.: 224.

12. Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation // Cell. 2011; 144: 646–674. DOI: 10.1016/j. cell.2011.02.013.

13. Loeb L.A. Human cancers express mutator phenotypes: origin, consequences and targeting // Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011; 11 (6): 450–57. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3063.

14. Weisenberger D.J., Siegmund K.D., Campan M., Young J., Long T.I., Faasse M.A. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer // Nat. Genet. 2006; 38 (7): 787–793. DOI: 10.1038/ng1834.

15. Gatenby R.A., Silva A.S., Gillies R.J., Frieden B.R. Adaptive Therapy // Cancer Res. 2009; 69 (11): 4894–4903. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3658.

16. Galon J., Mlecnik B., Bindea G., Angell H.K., Berger A., Lagorce C. Towards the introduction of the ‘Immunoscore’ in the classification of malignant tumours // J. Pathol. 2014; 232 (2): 199–209. DOI: 10.1002/path.4287.

17. Gilbert L.A., Hemann M.T. DNA damage-mediated induction of a chemoresistant niche // Cell. 2010; 143 (3): 355–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043.

18. Yang J., Li X., Liu X., Liu Y. The role of tumor-associated macrophages in breast carcinoma invasion and metastasis // Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015; 8 (6): 6656–6664.

19. Place A.E., Jin Huh S., Polyak K. The microenvironment in breast cancer progression: biology and implications for treatment // Breast Cancer Res. 2011. 13 (6): 227. DOI: 10.1186/bcr2912.

20. Pollard J.W. 2008. Macrophages define the invasive microenvironment in breast cancer // J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008; 84 (3): 623–630. DOI: 10.1189/jlb.1107762.

21. Correia A.L., Bissell M.J. The tumor microenvironment is a dominant force in multidrug resistance // Drug. Resist. Updat. 2012; 15 (0): 39–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2012.01.006.

22. Nakasone E.S., Askautrud H.A., Kees T. et al. Imaging tumor-stroma interactions during chemotherapy reveals contributions of the microenvironment to resistance // Cancer Cell. 2012. 21 (4): 488–503. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.017.

23. Pontiggia O., Sampayo R., Raffo D. et al. The tumor microenvironment modulates tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer: a role for soluble stromal factors and fibronectin through β1 integrin // Breast. Cancer Res. Treat. 2012; 133(2): 459–471. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1766-x.

24. Bissell M.J., Hines W.C. Why don’t we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression // Nat. Med. 2011. 17 (3): 320–329. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2328.

25. Bissell M.J., Radisky D. Putting tumours in context // Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2001; 1 (1): 46–54. DOI: 10.1038/35094059.

26. Noy R., Pollard J.W. Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy // Immunity. 2014; 41: 49–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010.

27. Riabov V., Gudima A., Wang N., Mickley A., Orekhov A., Kzhyshkowska J., Role of tumor associated macrophages in tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis // Front. Physiol. 2014; 5: 75. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00075.

28. Obeid E., Nanda R., Fu Y.X., Olopade O.I. The role of tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer progression // Int. J. Oncol. 2013; 43 (1): 5–12. DOI: 10.3892/ ijo.2013.1938.

29. Tsou C.L., Peters W., Si Y., Slaymaker S., Aslanian A.M., Weisberg S.P., Mack M., Charo I.F. Critical roles for CCR2 and MCP-3 in monocyte mobilization from bone marrow and recruitment to inflammatory sites // J. Clin. Invest. 2007; 117 (4): 902–909. DOI: 10.1172/JCI29919.

30. Allavena P., Sica A., Garlanda C., Mantovani A. The yinyang of tumor-associated macrophages in neoplastic progression and immune surveillance // Immunol. Rev. 2008; 222: 155–161. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00607.x.

31. Mills C.D., Kincaid K., Alt J.M., Heilman M.J., Hill A.M. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm // J. Immunol. 2000; 164 (12): 6166–6173.

32. Murray P.J., Allen J.E., Biswas S.K., Fisher E.A., Gilroy D.W., Goerdt S., Gordon S., Hamilton J.A., Ivashkiv L.B., Lawrence T. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines // Immunity. 2014; 41: 14–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008.

33. Wang R., Zhang J., Chen S., Lu M., Luo X., Yao S. et al. Tumor-associated macrophages provide a suitable microenvironment for non-small lung cancer invasion and progression // Lung Cancer. 2011; 74 (2): 188–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.04.009.

34. Franklin R.A., Liao W., Sarkar A., Kim M.V., Bivona M.R., Liu K., Pamer E.G., Li M.O. The cellular and molecular origin of tumor-associated macrophages // Science. 2014; 344 (6186): 921–925. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252510.

35. Laoui D., Movahedi K., Van Overmeire E., Van den Bossche J., Schouppe E., Mommer C., Nikolaou A., Morias Y., De Baetselier P., Van Ginderachter J.A.. Tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer: distinct subsets, distinct functions // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2011; 55: 861–867. DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.113371dl.

36. Fu X.T., Dai Z., Song K., Zhang Z.J., Zhou Z.J., Zhou S.L., Zhao Y.M., Xiao Y.S., Sun Q.M., Ding Z.B., Fan J. Macrophage-secreted IL-8 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by activating the JAK2/STAT3/Snail pathway // Int. J. Oncol. 2015; 46 (2): 587–596. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2761.

37. Chitu V., Stanley E.R. Colony-stimulating factor-1 in immunity and inflammation // Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006; 18 (1): 39-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.11.006.

38. Smith H.O., Stephens N.D., Qualls C.R., Fligelman T., Wang T., Lin C.Y., Burton E., Griffith J.K., Pollard J.W. The clinical significance of inflammatory cytokines in primary cell culture in endometrial carcinoma // Mol. Oncol. 2013; 7: 41–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc. 2012.07.002.

39. Wyckoff J.B., Wang Y., Lin E.Y., Li J.F., Goswami S., Stanley E.R., Segall J.E., Pollard J.W., Condeelis J. Direct visualization of macrophage-assisted tumor cell intravasation in mammary tumors // Cancer. Res. 2007; 67: 2649–2656. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1823.

40. Abraham D., Zins K., Sioud M. Lucas T., Schäfer R., Stanley E.R., Aharinejad S. Stromal cell-derived CSF-1 blockade prolongs xenograft survival of CSF-1-negative neuroblastoma // Int. J. Cancer. 2010; 126: 1339–1352. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24859.

41. Linde N., Lederle W., Depner S., van Rooijen N., Gutschalk C.M., Mueller M.M. Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced skin carcinogenesis depends on recruitment and alternative activation of macrophages // J. Pathol. 2012; 227:17–28. DOI: 10.1002/path.3989.

42. Brown D., Trowsdale J., Allen R. The LILR family: modulators of innate and adaptive immune pathways in health and disease // Tissue antigens. 2004; 64: 215–225. DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-2815.2004.00290.x.

43. Loke P., Allison J.P. PD-L1 and PD-L2 are differentially regulated by Th1 and Th2 cells // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003; 100: 5336–5341. DOI: 10.1073/ pnas.0931259100.

44. Belai E.B., de Oliveira C.E., Gasparoto T.H., Ramos R.N., Torres S.A., Garlet G.P., Cavassani K.A., Silva J.S., Campanelli A.P. PD-1 blockage delays murine squamous cell carcinoma development // Carcinogenesis. 2014; 35: 424–431. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgt305.

45. Simpson T.R., Li F., Montalvo-Ortiz W., Sepulveda M.A., Bergerhoff K., Arce F., Roddie C., Henry J.Y., Yagita H., Wolchok J.D., Peggs K.S., Ravetch J.V., Allison J.P., Quezada S.A. Fc-dependent depletion of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells codefines the efficacy of anti– CTLA-4 therapy against melanoma // J. Exp. Med. 2013; 210: 1695–1710. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20130579.

46. Oh S.A., Li M.O. TGF-β: guardian of T cell function // J. Immunol. 2013; 191 (8): 3973–3979. DOI: 10.4049/ jimmunol.1301843.

47. Ng T.H., Britton G.J., Hill E.V., Verhagen J., Burton B.R., Wraith D.C. Regulation of adaptive immunity; the role of interleukin-10 // Front. Immunol. 2013; 4: 129. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00129.

48. Adeegbe D.O., Nishikawa H. Natural and induced T regulatory cells in cancer // Frontiers in immunology. 2013; 4: 190. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00190.

49. Gabrilovich D.I., Ostrand-Rosenberg S., Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumors. Nature reviews // Immunology. 2012; 12: 253–268. DOI: 10.1038/ nri3175.

50. Sainz J.B., Mart´ın B., Tatari M., Heeschen C., Guerra S., ISG15 is a critical microenvironmental factor for pancreatic cancer stem cells // Cancer Research. 2014; 74 (24): 7309–7320, 2014. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9383.

51. Joyce J.A., Pollard J.W. Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis // Nature reviews. Cancer. 2009; 9: 239– 252. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2618.

52. Rohan T.E., Xue X., Lin H.M., D’Alfonso T.M., Ginter P.S., Oktay M.H., Robinson B.D., Ginsberg M., Gertler F.B., Glass A.G., Sparano J.A., Condeelis J.S., Jones J.G. Tumor microenvironment of metastasis and risk of distant metastasis of breast cancer // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014; 106 (8): dju136. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju136.

53. Qian B.Z., Li J., Zhang H. et al. CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumour metastasis // Nature. 2011; 475 (7355): 222–5. DOI: 10.1038/nature10138.

54. Qian B., Deng Y., Im J.H., Muschel R.J., Zou Y., Li J., Lang R.A., Pollard J.W. A distinct macrophage population mediates metastatic breast cancer cell extravasation, establishment and growth // PloS one. 2009; 4: e6562. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006562.

55. Gao D., Vahdat L.T., Wong S. Chang J.C., Mittal V. Microenvironmental regulation of epithelialmesenchymal transitions in cancer // Cancer. Res. 2012; 72 (19): 4883–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1223.

56. Перельмутер В.М., Манских В.Н. Прениша как от- сутствующее звено концепции метастатических ниш, объясняющее избирательное метастазирование зло- качественных опухолей и форму метастатической болезни // Биохимия. 2012; 77 (1): 130–139. Perelmuter V.M., Manskih V.N. Prenisha kak otsutstvuuyschee zveno koncepcii metastaticheskih nish, ob`yasnyayuschee izbiratelnoe metastazirovanie zlokachestvennyh opukholei i formu metastaticheskoi bolezni [Preniche as missing link of the metastatic niche concept explaining organ-preferential metastasis of malignant tumors and the type of metastatic disease] // Biokhimiya – Biochemistry. 2012; 77 (1): 130–139 (in Russia).

57. Zitvogel L., Galluzzi L., Smyth M.J., Kroemer G. Mechanism of action of conventional and targeted anticancer therapies: reinstating immunosurveillance // Immunity. 2013; 39 (1): 74–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.014.

58. Bracci L., Schiavoni G., Sistigu A., Belardelli F. Immune-based mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy: implications for the design of novel and rationale-based combined treatments against cancer // Cell. Death. and Differentiation. 2014. 21: 15–25. DOI:10.1038/ cdd.2013.67.

59. Gampenrieder S.P., Rinnerthaler G., Greil R. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy in breast cancer: past, present, and future // J. Oncol. 2013; 2013:732047. DOI: 10.1155/2013/732047.

60. Thompson A.M., Moulder-Thompson S.L. 2012. Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer // Ann. Oncol. 23 Suppl. 10, x231. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds324.

61. De Palma M., Lewis C.E. Cancer: Macrophages limit chemotherapy // Nature. 2011; 472 (7343): 303–304. DOI: 10.1038/472303a.

62. Hughes R., Qian B.Z., Rowan C., Muthana M., Keklikoglou I., Olson O.C., Tazzyman S., Danson S., Addison C., Clemons M., Gonzalez-Angulo A.M., Joyce J.A., De Palma M., Pollard J.W., Lewis C.E. Perivascular M2 macrophages stimulate tumor relapse after chemotherapy // Cancer Res. 2015; 75 (17): 3479–3491. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3587.

63. Germano G., Frapolli R., Belgiovine C., Anselmo A., Pesce S., Liguori M., Erba E., Uboldi S., Zucchetti M., Pasqualini F. Role of macrophage targeting in the antitumor activity of trabectedin // Cancer Cell. 2013; 23: 249–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.008.

64. Srivastava K., Hu J., Korn C., Savant S., Teichert M., Kapel S.S., Jugold M., Besemfelder E., Thomas M., Pasparakis M., Augustin H.G. Postsurgical adjuvant tumor therapy by combining anti-angiopoietin-2 and metronomic chemotherapy limits metastatic growth // Cancer Cell. 2014; 26: 880–895. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.11.005.

65. Mantovani A., Allavena P. The interaction of anticancer therapies with tumor-associated macrophages // J. Exp. Med. 2015; 212 (4): 435–445. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20150295. 66. De Palma, M., Lewis C.E. 2013. Macrophage regulation of tumor responses to anticancer therapies // Cancer Cell. 23: 277–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.013.

66. Zavyalova M.V., Denisov E.V., Tashireva L.A., Gerashchenko T.S., Litviakov N.V., Skryabin N.A., Vtorushin S.V., Telegina N.S., Slonimskaya E.M., Cherdyntseva N.V., Perelmuter V.M. Phenotypic drift as a cause for intratumoral morphological heterogeneity of invasive ductal breast carcinoma not otherwise specified // Biores. Open Access. 2013; 2 (2): 148-54. DOI: 10.1089/ biores.2012.0278.

67. Tashireva L.A., Denisov E.V., Gerashchenko T.S., Pautova D.N., Buldakov M.A., Zavyalova M.V., Kzhyshkowska J., Cherdyntseva N.V., Perelmuter V.M. Intratumoral heterogeneity of macrophages and fibroblasts in breast cancer is associated with the morphological diversity of tumor cells and contributes to lymph node metastasis // Immunobiology. 2017; 222 (4): 631–640. DOI: 10.1016/j. imbio.2016.11.012.

68. Denisov E.V., Skryabin N.A., Gerashchenko T.S., Tashireva L.A., Wilhelm J., Buldakov M.A., Sleptcov A.A., Lebedev I.N., Vtorushin S.V., Zavyalova M.V., Cherdyntseva N.V., Perelmuter V.M. Clinically relevant morphological structures in breast cancer represent transcriptionally distinct tumor cell populations with varied degrees of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and CD44+CD24- stemness // Oncotarget. 2017. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18022.

69. Gerashchenko T.S., Denisov E.V., Litviakov N.V., Zavyalova M.V., Vtorushin S.V., Tsyganov M.M., Perelmuter V.M., Cherdyntseva N.V. Intratumor heterogeneity: nature and biological significance // Biochemistry (Mosc). 2013; 78: 1201. DOI: 10.1134/S0006297913110011.

70. Buldakov M., Zavyalova M., Krakhmal N., Telegina N., Vtorushin S., Mitrofanova I., Riabov V., Yin S., Song B., Cherdyntseva N., Kzhyshkowska J. CD68+, but not stabilin-1+ tumor associated macrophages in gaps of ductal tumor structures negatively correlate with the lymphatic metastasis in human breast cancer // Immunobiology. 2015; 222 (1): 31–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.09.011.

71. Mitrofanova I., Zavyalova M., Telegina N., Buldakov M., Riabov V., Cherdyntseva N., Kzhyshkowska J. Tumor-associated macrophages in human breast cancer parenchyma negatively correlate with lymphatic metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy // Immunobiology. 2017; 222 (1): 101–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.08.001.

72. Shao R., Hamel K., Petersen L., Cao Q.J., Arenas R.B., Bigelow C., Bentley B., Yan W. YKL-40, a secreted glycoprotein, promotes tumor angiogenesis // Oncogene. 2009; 28 (50): 4456-68. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.292.

73. Kzhyshkowska J., Yin S., Liu T., Riabov V., Mitrofanova I. Role of chitinase-like proteins in cancer // Biol. Chem. 2016; 397 (3): 231–247. DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2015-0269.

74. Kzhyshkowska J., Gratchev A., Goerdt S. Human chitinases and chitinase-like proteins as indicators for inflammation and cancer // Biomark Insights. 2007; 2: 128–246.

75. Biggar R.J., Johansen J.S., Smedby K.E., Rostgaard K., Chang E.T., Adami H.O., Glimelius B., Molin D., Hamilton-Dutoit S., Melbye M., Hjalgrim H. Serum YKL-40 and interleukin 6 levels in Hodgkin lymphoma // Clin. Cancer Res. 2008; 14 (21): 6974-6978. DOI: 10.1158/1078- 0432.CCR-08-1026.

76. Kzhyshkowska J., Mamidi S., Gratchev A., Kremmer E., Schmuttermaier C., Krusell L., Haus G., Utikal J., Schledzewski K., Scholtze J., Goerdt S. Novel stabilin-1 interacting chitinase-like protein (SI-CLP) is up-regulated in alternatively activated macrophages and secreted via lysosomal pathway // Blood. 2006; 107: 3221–3228. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2843.

77. Faneyte I.F., Schrama J.G., Peterse J.L., Remijnse P.L., Rodenhuis S., van de Vijver M.J.. Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome // Br. J. Cancer 2003; 88 (3): 406–412. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600749.

78. Casazza A., Laoui D., Wenes M., Rizzolio S., Bassani N., Mambretti M., Deschoemaeker S., Van Ginderachter J.A., Tamagnone L., Mazzone M.. Impeding macrophage entry into hypoxic tumor areas by Sema3A/Nrp1 signaling blockade inhibits angiogenesis and restores antitumor immunity // Cancer Cell. 2013; 24: 695–709. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2013.11.007.


Review

For citations:


Cherdyntseva N.V., Mitrofanova I.V., Buldakov M.A., Stakheeva M.N., Patysheva M.R., Zavjalova M.V., Kzhyshkowska J.G. Macrophages and tumor progression: on the way to macrophage-specific therapy. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017;16(4):61-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-4-61-74

Views: 2551


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-0363 (Print)
ISSN 1819-3684 (Online)