Preview

Bulletin of Siberian Medicine

Advanced search

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MATERIALS USED IN DENTAL IMPLANTATION

https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2014-6-41-47

Abstract

The objective of the research is a review of some characteristics of dental implants’ products and an analysis of prospects of using them in modern medicine.

Dental implantation as a high-technology method of restoring the natural anatomical structure has no competitors at present. The advantages of dental implants consist in their high operational dependability, a longer life time, a higher functionality and a lesser rate of complications as compared to the use of complete or bridge prostheses.

The materials used in dental implantation for this purpose are rather diverse. Doctors using them rely on extensive clinical experience, a developed industry of accessory materials, instruments, that is everything that ensures comfortable work and conveniences for the patient.

At the same time, the data mentioned in the article testify to the effect that ceramic implants as compared to titanium alloy implants have comparable or better indices. This is guaranteed, for example, by the requirements of the new international standard ISO6474-2:2012: first-rate strength and wear resistance; thermal stability and corrosion resistance; ceramics’ four point bending strength over 750 MPa.

The result of the conducted analysis is a review of using various materials in dental implantation. The author compares the aesthetic indices and durability of titanium or metal alloy implants to those of ceramic ones. The comparison shows that, under the current level of ceramic materials’ structural property, it is actual for dentistry to develop its own methodological approaches in relation to a wide use of ceramic implants and creation of various ceramic mono-implants with the purpose of improving the results of treatment of patients, suffering from secondary partial or complete adentia accompanied by bone tissue deficiency, by applying the methods of dental implantation.

About the Authors

A. A. Yegorov
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Yegorov Anatoly A.


M. N. Drovosekov
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Drovosekov Mikhail N.


A. M. Aronov
NEVZ-CERAMICS Company, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Aronov Anatoly M.


O. M. Rozhnova
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthpaedic named after Ya.L. Tsivyan
Russian Federation
Rozhnova Olga M.


O. P. Yegorova
Vita-dent Company Ltd, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Yegorova Olga P.


References

1. Giuseppe V., Gianpaolo S. Comparative Evaluation of Osseointegrated Dental Implants Based on Platform-Switching Concept: Influence of Diameter, Length, Thread Shape, and In-Bone Positioning Depth on Stress-Based Per-formance. Comput. Math. Methods Med., 2014. Article ID 467358.

2. Mikhailina N.A., Podzorova L.I., Rumyantseva M.N., Shvorne¬va L.I., Ovchinnikova O.A., Anisimova S.V., Lebe-denko I.Yu., Lebedenko A.I., Khvan V.I. Keramika na osnove tetragonal'nogo dioksida cirkoniya dlya restavracionnoi stomatologii. Perspektivnye materialy, 2010, no. 3, pp. 44–49 (in Russian).

3. Kirilova I.A., Sadovoj M.A., Podorozhnaja V.T. Sravnitel'naja harakteristika materialov dlya kostnoj plastiki: sostav i svoistva. Hirurgija pozvonochnika, 2012, no. 3, pp. 72–83 (in Russian).

4. Vegera I., Gordienko A., Novik G., Rahuba D., Sidorenko A. Biosovmestimost' titanovyh splavov medicinskogo nazna-chenija. Nauka i innovacii, 2009, no. 2 (72). URL: http://innosfera.org/node/361 (in Russian).

5. Karlov A.V., Shakhov V.P. Systems of external fixation and regulatory mechanisms of optimal biomechanics. Tomsk, STT Publ., 2001. 477 p. (in Russian).

6. Sidel'nikov A.I. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika materialov gruppy titana, ispol'zuemyh v proizvodstve sovremennyh dental'nyh implantatov. Info-Dent, 2000, no. 5, pp. 10–12 (in Russian).

7. URL: http://osadchiclinic.com/creativework

8. Besgina Ye.V., Kulakov O.B., Chilikin L.V., Golovin K.I. Zirconium and titanium. Dental'naja implantologija – Dental implantology, 2012 (in Russian).

9. Kirilova I.A., Sadovoij M.A., Podorozhnaya V.T., Taranov O.S., Klinkov S.V., Kosarev V.F., Shatskaya S.S. Izuchenie strukturnyh harakteristik perspektivnogo dlja hirurgicheskoj vertebrologii kompozicionnogo kostno-keramicheskogo materiala. Hirurgija pozvonochnika, 2014, no. 1, pp. 100–110 (in Russian).

10. Nyashin Ju.I. et al. Biomehanicheskii analiz zubnyh implantatov iz splava titana i dioksida cirkonija. Rossijskii zhurnal biomehaniki – Russian Journal of Biomechanics, 2012, vol. 16, no. 1 (55), pp. 102–109 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Yegorov A.A., Drovosekov M.N., Aronov A.M., Rozhnova O.M., Yegorova O.P. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MATERIALS USED IN DENTAL IMPLANTATION. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2014;13(6):41-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2014-6-41-47

Views: 1114


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-0363 (Print)
ISSN 1819-3684 (Online)