THOUGHT IN THE ASPECT OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2014-4-149-155
Abstract
Phenomenon of thought and its’ interpretations at the different cultural and historical stages are in focus of the paper. The research is aimed at reasoning of new interpretation of thought revealed as a result of cognitive science and convergent technologies transdisciplinary research.
Transdisciplinary research of thought in cognitive science is achieved with the unity of method, which is the systemic-evolutionary approach.
The research is based on thought analysis in philosophy, cognitive psychology, cognitive linguistics, artificial intelligence science, thus mainly on transdisciplinary research of thought in cognitive science.
The paper represents the approach of cognitive science and NBIC (Nano-, Bio-, Information and Cognitive) technologies implementing transdisciplinary research of thought and intelligence.
It is shown that the transdisciplinary approach is based on new ontology, called holistic, and on nonclassical epistemology. Answering the raised question of the outcome of thought transdisciplinary research comparing to specifically scientific and philosophic, it is reasoned that cognitive science studies thought at the higher level of complexity, considering simultaneously several order parameters characterizing this complex nonlinear phenomenon.About the Author
I. V. Chernikova
National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk;
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Lakoff D. Women, fire and dangerous things: What language categories tell us about thinking. Moscow, Languages of the Slavonic Culture Publ., 2004. 792 p. (in Russian).
2. Dubrovsky D.I. Conscience, brain, artificial intelligence. Moscow, PH Strategy-Centre Publ., 2007. 264 p. (in Russian).
3. Ivanitsky A.M. Natural Sciences and the problem of conscience. Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk – Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2004, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 716–723 (in Russian).
4. Naisser U. Cognition and reality. Moscow, Science Publ., 1981. 230 p. (in Russian).
5. Convergence of biological, information, nano- and cognitive technologies: challenge for philosophy. Materials of the round table discussion. Issues of Philosophy, 2012, no. 12, pp. 3–23 (in Russian).
6. Chernigovskaya T.V. If mirror will look in the mirror, what will it see. Cognitive research: proceedings, iss. 4. Moscow, RAS Institute of Psychology Press Publ., 2010. Pp. 13–37 (in Russian).
7. Nort D. Understanding of the economic change process. Moscow, HSE Press Publ., 2010. 256 p. (in Russian).
8. Renfield W. The Mystery of Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press Publ., 1975. P. 68.
9. Knyazeva Ye.N. Physical and enactive cognition: new research program in epistemology. Epistemology: development prospects. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2012, pp. 315–352 (in Russian).
10. Domasio A. Descartes Error: Emotion Reason and the Human Brain. New York, Avon Books, 1994.
11. Aleksandrov Yu.I. Emotion and moral. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2008, vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 196–201 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Chernikova I.V. THOUGHT IN THE ASPECT OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2014;13(4):149-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2014-4-149-155
Views:
839
Email this article 