EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS AND ENDOGENOUS FACTORS ON THE RATE OF CONSOLIDATION OF FRACTURES OF THE LONG BONES IN OSTEOSYNTHESIS
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2015-1-73-80
Abstract
Purpose. Determine endogenous and exogenous factors influencing the pace of consolidation in osteosynthesis implants with different types of coatings. Based on the characteristics of the selected offer the best conditions for the application of bioactive structures.
Material and methods. The work is based on an analysis of surgical treatment of 1265 patients with hip fractures, tibial and shoulder. Take into account the influence of age, gender, thе timing of the operation, quality reposition, comorbidities, location and severity of the fracture, implant сoating violation bone repair.
Results. Received consolidation using bioactive plates in 99.3 % of patients. Well executed reposition 4.5 times reduced cases of delayed consolidation. The main reason for delayed fracture healing in patients older than 60 years is osteoporosis. Males under 40 years compared with women of the same age often observed slow formation of callus, which is associated with frequent presence in them of comminuted fractures. The most frequently observed sustained fusion in patients with tibial fractures, which is primarily due to the prevalence of lesions in this segment. The main mechanism of action of bioactive positive plates can be explained by the peculiarities microarchitectonics coverage closer to the physiological structure of bone, increasing the concentration of osteogenic cells around the implant and stimulation of their function. Application of bioactive plates most appropriate for osteoporosis, type C lesions, pseudoarthrosis, reoperations during migration and metal fracture, in multiple and combined injuries.
About the Author
V. P. PopovRussian Federation
Popov Vladimir P.
References
1. Guseinov A.G. Rezervy povysheniya effektivnosti lecheniya diafizarnyh perelomov goleni na osnove metoda Ilizarova [Provisions to improve the effectiveness of the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia on the basis of the Ilizarov method]. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova – Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics Priorov, 2005, no. 1, pp. 11–15 (in Russian).
2. Barabash A.P., Shpinyak S.P., Barabash Yu. A. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika metodov osteositeza u pacientov s oskol'chatymi perelomami diafiza bedrennoy kosti. [Comparative Characteristics of Osteosynthesis Techniquesin Patients with Comminuted Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii – Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia, 2013, no. 2, pp. 116–124 (in Russian).
3. Nork S.E. Femoral shaft fractures. In: Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2010. Pp. 1654–1718.
4. Klimovitsky V.G., Tyazhelov A.A., Lafi Hatem, Lobanov G.V., Chernysh V.Yu., Yares'ko A.V. Analiz naprjazhennodeformirovannogo sostojanija bol'shebercovoj kosti pri ee osteosinteze s ispol'zovaniem razlichnyh fiksirujushhih ustrojstv [Analysis of stress-strain stateof tibia in osteosynthesis with differentfixation devices]. Politravma –Polytrauma, 2013, no. 3, pp. 37–42 (in Russian).
5. Shimon V.M., Geleta M.M., Sheregiy A.A. Primenenie sterzhnevyh apparatov pri povrezhdenijah dlinnyh trubchatyh kostej pri osteoporoze [The use of rod apparatus in injuries to the long bones in osteoporosis]. Travma – Trauma, 2010, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 48–52 (in Russian).
6. Petrovskaya T.S., Shakhov V.P., Vereshchagin V.I., Ignatov V.P. Biomaterialy i implantaty dlya travmatologii i ortopedii [Biomaterials and implants for traumatology and orthopedics]. Tomsk, Tomsk Polytechnic University Publ., 2011. 307 p. (in Russian).
7. Nakayama H., Kawase T., Kogami H., Okuda K., Inoue H., Oda T., Hayama K., Tsuchimochi M., Wolff L. Evaluation by bone scintigraphy of osteogenic activity of commercial bioceramics (porous β-TCP and HAp particles) subcutaneously implanted in rats. J. Biomater. Appl., 2010, vol. 24, pp. 751–768.
8. Stepanov R.V. Kompleksnaja luchevaja diagnostika v ocenke reparativnogo processa pri lechenii bol'nyh s zakrytymi diafizarnymi perelomami kostej goleni: avtoref. dis. … kand. med. nauk [Complex radiology in the assessment of the reparative process in the treatment of patients with closed diaphyseal fractures of the tibia:Author. Dis. … Cand. med. sci.]. Moscow, 2011, 22 p. (in Russian).
9. Travmatologiya: nacional'noe rukovodstvo [Traumatology: national leadership]. Ed. Kotel'nikov G.P., Mironov S.P. Moscow, GEOSTAR-Media Publ., 2008. 808 p. (in Russian).
10. Galliera E., Luzzati A., Perrucchini G. et al. Bone formation and resorption markers as diagnostic tools for bonemetastases evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Markers, 2012, vol. 27, iss. 4, pp. 395–399.
11. Popov V.P., Druzhinina T.V., Kamenchuk Ya.A., Zavadovskaya V.D., Akbasheva O.Ye., Fomina S.V. Osobennosti kostnogo metabolizma pri osteosintezeimplantatami s razlichnymi pokrytijami [Characteristics of bone metabolism in osteosynthesis using implants with different coatings]. Politravma – Polytrauma, 2013, no. 2, pp. 16–21 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Popov V.P. EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS AND ENDOGENOUS FACTORS ON THE RATE OF CONSOLIDATION OF FRACTURES OF THE LONG BONES IN OSTEOSYNTHESIS. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2015;14(1):73-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2015-1-73-80