Virtual patients as a format for simulation learning in continuing medical education (review article)
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2020-1-140-149
Abstract
The use of virtual patients for students and for advanced training of medical doctors is a definite pedagogic innovation. The computer-based interactive multimedia simulations of scenarios for diagnosis and treatment allow for the avoidance of the risk of improper actions in regard to a real life patient, to repeat the clinical situations an unlimited number of times, and to standardize the tasks and criteria of their completion. Virtual patients represent a factual basis of problem-based learning. This review article focuses on the use of this educational technology for the development of medical decision making skills internationally, on its pedagogical effectiveness, and on the variants of the linear and branching scenarios. Meta-analyses demonstrate the pedagogical effectiveness of virtual patients and an interest of the trainees. An integration of the virtual patients into the learning contributes to clinical training gamification, which inspires the students and medical doctors to engage in interactivity and teamwork. The creation of a repository or a web-service of multimedia virtual patients in the tradition of national clinical school is of great current interest for implementation in the system of higher and continuing medical education.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The author expresses gratitude to the Russian Foundation for Basic Research for financial support of the work under the grant No. 19-013-00231 A “Information and communication technologies for the formation and improvement of clinical and diagnostic competencies of students in the system of postgraduate medical education”.
About the Author
S. I. Karas
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Centre;
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
111a, Kievskaja Str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
2, Moscow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
References
1. Cendan J., Lok B. The use of virtual patients in medical school curricula. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2012; 36 (1): 48–53. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00054.2011.
2. Poulton T., Conradi E., Kavia S., Round J., Hilton S.R. The replacement of ‘paper’ cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem – based learning. Medical Teacher. 2009; 31 (8): 752–758. DOI: 10.1080/01421590903141082.
3. Pozner Ch.N. Медицинская симуляция в США. Медицинское образование и профессиональное развитие. 2013; 2–3: 83–100.
4. Горшков М.Д., Мороз В.В., Евдокимов Е.А. Симуляционное обучение по анестезиологии и реаниматологии. М: РОСОМЕД, 2014: 312.
5. Толмачев И.В., Рипп Е.Г., Тропин С.В., Карпушкина Е.В., Цверова А.С. Разработка информационной модели клинических сценариев на базе обучающего симуляционного центра. Бюллетень сибирской медицины. 2014; 13 (4): 118–122. DOI: 10.20538/1682-0363-2014-4-118-122.
6. Harless W., Drennon G., Marxer J., Root J., Miller G. CASE: a computer-aided simulation of the clinical encounter. J. Med. Educ.1971; 46 (5): 443–448.
7. Ellaway R.H., Davies D. Design for learning: deconstructing virtual patient activities. Med. Teach. 2011; 33 (4): 303–310. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550969.
8. Cook D., Erwin P., Triola M. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine. 2010; 85 (10): 1589–1602. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13.
9. Huwendiek S., Reichert F., Bosse H.-M., DeLeng B.A., Van Der Vlueten C., Haag M., Hoffman G.F., Tönshoff B. Design principles for virtual patients: A focus group study among students. Med. Educ. 2009; 43 (6): 580–588. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03369.x.
10. Poulton T., Balasubramaniam C. Virtual patients: A year of change. Med. Teach. 2011; 33 (11): 933–937. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.613501.
11. Posel N., Shore B.M., Fleiszer D. Virtual patient cases: a qualitative study of the requirements and perceptions of authors. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2012; 3: 175–182. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.5038.a1e1.
12. Kononowicz A.A., Zary N., Edelbring S., Corral J., and Hege I. Virtual patients – what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Med. Educ. 2015; 15: 11. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3.
13. Hege I., Kononowicz A., Tolks D.,Edelbring S., Kublmeyer K. A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review. BMC Med. Educ. 2016; 16: 146. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8.
14. Cook D.A., Triola M.M. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med. Educ. 2009; 43 (4): 303–311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x.
15. Srinivasan M., Wilkes M., Stevenson F., Nguyen T., Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with casebased learning: Effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Academic Medicine. 2007; 82 (1): 74–82. DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000249963.93776.aa.
16. Лалов Ю.В., Осадчук О.Л. Формирование профессионального мышления у будущих врачей посредством кейс-метода обучения. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2016; 2-2: 302–305.
17. Кобринский Б.А., Путинцев А.Н. О принципах построения интеллектуальных медицинских обучающих систем на основе case-метода. Искусственный интеллект и поддержка принятия решений. 2016; 2: 30–37.
18. Гаранина Р.М., Гаранин А.А. Возможности и перспективы применения метода кейс-анализа в подготовке врачей клинических специальностей. Медицинское образование и профессиональное развитие. 2016; 4 (26): 39–48.
19. Путинцев А.Н., Алексеев Т.В. Кейс-метод в медицинском образовании: современные программные продукты. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2016; 12 (9): 1655–1659.
20. Агранович Н.В, Бабашева Г.Г., Агранович О.В., Зеленский В.А. Использование компьютерных обучающих программ в преподавании клинических дисциплин в медицинском вузе в рамках подготовки студентов к профессиональной деятельности в современных условиях. Здоровье и образование в XXI веке. 2016; 18 (5): 31–34.
21. Алимов Д.В., Гулиев Я.И., Зарубина Т.В., Комаров С.И., Потапова И.И., Раузина С.Е. Использование учебной версии интегрированной медицинской информационной системы в образовательном процессе. Врач и информационные технологии. 2013; 6: 34–41.
22. Карась С.И., Корнева И.О., Аржаник М.Б., Семенова О.Л., Черникова Е.В., Урнева О.В., Гречишникова А.Ю. Роль и перспективы использования информационно-коммуникационных технологий в формировании врачебных компетенций. Врач и информационные технологии. 2018; 4: 46–58.
23. Карась С.И., Колганов С.О. Web-сервис формирования клинико-диагностических компетенций студентов и врачей в системе непрерывного медицинского образования. Свидетельство о государственной регистрации программы для ЭВМ № 2019614701, 2019.
24. Карась С.И., Колганов С.О. База данных виртуальных пациентов для сервиса формирования клинико-диагностических компетенций студентов и врачей в системе непрерывного медицинского образования. Свидетельство о государственной регистрации базы данных № 2019620554, 2019.
25. Пономарев А.В. Виртуальное моделирование профессиональных задач в стоматологическом образовании. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. 2011; 4: 127–139.
26. Грибова В.В., Петряева М.В., Окунь Д.Б., Краснов Д.А., Островский Г.Е. Программная оболочка для создания интеллектуальных систем в практической и образовательной медицине. Информатика и системы управления. 2017; 4 (54): 114–124. DOI: 10.22250/isu.2017.54.114-124.
27. Муравьев К.А., Ходжаян А.Б., Рой С.В. Симуляционное обучение в медицинском образовании – переломный момент. Фундаментальные исследования. 2011; 10–3: 534–537.
28. Kononowicz A., Hege I. Virtual patients as a practical realisation of the e-learning idea in medicine. in: e-learning experiences and future. Ed. by Safeeullah Soomro: IntechOpen, 2010: 345–370. DOI: 10.5772/8803.
29. Lee R., Kwan C.Y. The use of problem-based learning in medical education. J. Med. Education. 1997; 1: 149–158.
30. Ellaway R.H., Poulton T., Jivram T. Decision PBL: a 4-year retrospective case study of the use of virtual patients in problem – based learning. Med. Teach. 2015; 37 (10): 926–934. DOI: 10.3109/0142159 X.2014.970627.
31. Savery J.R. Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. 2006; 1 (1). DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
32. Berman N., Fall L.H., Smith S., Levine D.A., Maloney C.G., Potts M., Siegel B., Foster-Johnson L. Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Acad. Med. 2009; 84 (7): 942–949. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b01 3e3181a8c668.
33. Hege I., Kononowicz A.A., Berman N.B., Kiesewetter J. Advancing clinical reasoning in virtual patients – development and application of a conceptual framework. GMS J. Med. Educ. 2018; 35 (1): Doc12. DOI: 10.3205/zma001159.
34. Doloca A., Ţanculescu O., Ciongradi I., Trandafir L.M., Stoleriu S., Ifteni G. Comparative study of virtual patient applications. Proc. of the Romanian Academy, Series A. 2015; 16 (3): 466–473.
35. Bateman J., Allen M., Kidd J., Davies D. Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study. Med. Educ. 2013; 4 (6): 595–606. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12151.
36. Begg M. Virtual patients: practical advice for clinical authors using Labyrinth. Clinical Teacher. 2010; 7 (3): 202–205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00382.x.
37. Posel N., McGee J.B., Fleiszer D.M. Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases. Medical Teacher. 2015; 37 (9): 813–818. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.993951.
38. Huwendiek S., de Leng B.A. Virtual patient design and curricular integration evaluation toolkit. Med. Educ. 2010; 44 (5): 519. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03665.x.
39. Consorti F., Mancuso R., Nocioni M. et al. Efficacy of virtual patients in medical education: A meta-analysis of randomized studies. Computers & Education. 2012; 59 (3): 1001–1008. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.017.
40. Saleh N. The value of virtual patients in medical education. Annals of Behavioral Science and Medical Education. 2010; 16 (2): 29–31. DOI: 10.1007/BF03355129.
41. Schauber S.K., Hecht M., Nouns Z.M., Dettmer S. On the role of biomedical knowledge in the acquisition of clinical knowledge. Medical Education. 2013; 47 (12): 1223–1235. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12229.
42. Klemenc-Ketis Z., Cagran B., Dinevsky D. Evaluating the difference between virtual and paper-based clinical cases in family medicine undergraduate education. Advances in Medicine. 2018: Article ID 1408450. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1408450.
43. Murphy S., Imam B., Whitehouse L. Twelve Tips for Utilizing Virtual Patients to Teach Professionalism. Med. Ed. Publish. 2016; 5 (3): 21. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2016.000107.
44. Botezatu M., Hult H., Fors U.G. Virtual patient simulation: What do students make of it? A focus group study. BMC Med. Educ. 2010; 10: 91. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-91.
45. Edelbring S., Dastmalchi M., Hult H., Lundberg I.E., Dahlgren L.O..Experiencing virtual patients in clinical learning: a phenomenological study. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 2011; 16 (3): 331–345. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9265-0.
46. Poulton T., Ellaway R.H., Round J., Kavia S., Hilton S. Exploring the efficacy of replacing linear paper - based patient cases in problem-based learning with dynamic web-based virtual patients: randomized trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2014; 16 (11): e240. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3748.
47. Ellaway R., Poulton T., Fors U., McGee G.B., Albright S. Building a virtual patient commons. Med. Teach. 2008; 30 (2): 170–174. DOI: 10.1080/01421590701874074.
48. Kreiter C.D., Haugen T., Leaven T., Goerdt C., Rosenthal N., McGaghie W.C., Dee F. A report on the piloting of a novel computer-based medical case simulation for teaching and formative assessment of diagnostic laboratory testing. Medical Education Online. 2011; 16: 5646. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.5646.
49. Kolb D.A., Fry R.E. Toward an Applied Theory of Experiential Learning. In: C. Cooper (ed.) Theories of group processes. NY: J. Wiley and Sons, 1975.
50. Berman N.B., Durning S.J., Fischer M.R., Huwendiek S., Triola M.M. The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Acad. Med. 2016; 91 (9): 1217–1222. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001146.
51. Bearman M. Is virtual the same as real? Medical students’ experiences of a virtual patient. Acad. Med. 2003; 78 (5): 538–545. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200305000-00021.
52. Toro-Troconis M., Mellström U., Partridge M.R., Meeran K., Barrett M., Higham J. ‘Designing game-based learning activities for virtual patients in Second Life. J. Cyber Therapy & Rehabilitation. 2008; 1 (3): 227–239.
53. Toro-Troconis M.M., Kamat A., Partridge M.R. Design and development of a component-based system for virtual patients in the virtual world of second life. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence. 2011; 3 (4): 308–316.
54. Muntean V., Calinici T., Tigan S., Fors U. Language, culture and international exchange of virtual patients. BMC Medical Education. 2013. 13: 21. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-21.
55. Логвинов Ю.И., Ющенко Г.В., Орловская А.И. Оценка эффективности обучения с использованием симуляционных технологий. Мед. образование и проф. развитие. 2018; 1 (31): 86–105.
56. Aquifer (MedU): resource for advancing clinical teaching and learning. URL: https://www.aquifer.org (25.06.2019).
57. ANSI/MEDBIQ LO.10.1-2008 Healthcare Learning Object Metadata Specifications and Description Document. URL: https://www.medbiq.org/working_groups/learning_objects/HealthcareLOMSpecification.pdf (25.06.2019).
58. Electronic Virtual Patients: resource for clinical training. URL: http://www.virtualpatients.eu (25.06.2019).
59. Calinici T., Muntean V. Open labyrinth – a web application for medical education using virtual patients. Applied Medical Informatics Original Research. 2010; 27 (4): 15 URL: 20.
60. Zary N., Johnson G., Boberg J., Fors U. Development, implementation and pilot evaluation of a Web-based virtual patient case simulation environment – Web-SP. BMC Med. Educ. 2006; 6: 10. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-10.
61. AMA Innovations in Medical Education Webinar Series: Implementing a Teaching Virtual EHR as a Clinical Learning Platform. URL: https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/public/ace/teach-virtual-ehr.pdf (25.06.2019).
62. The Regenstrief EHR Clinical Learning Platform. URL: https://www.regenstrief.org/resources/clinical-learning (25.06.2019).
Review
For citations:
Karas S.I. Virtual patients as a format for simulation learning in continuing medical education (review article). Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2020;19(1):140-149. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2020-1-140-149
Views:
1350
Email this article 