DIAGNOSTIC OPPORTUNITIES OF NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGIC INSPECTION AT RS: ROLE OF AN OPTICAL COHERENT TOMOGRAPHY AND THE VISUAL CAUSED POTENTIALS IN EARLY DIAGNOSTICS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND MONITORING OF A CONDITION OF THE VISUAL ANALYZER AT PATIENTS WITH VARIOUS OPTIONS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2013-5-119-125
Abstract
About the Author
Ye. A. AndreyevaRussian Federation
Andreeva Yelena A.
References
1. Averbakh I.M. Elements of anatomy of the ophthalmologist. Moscow, 1952. 105 p. (in Russian).
2. Averyanov D.A. et al. Optical coherent tomography in an ophthalmology. Eds. A.G. Shchuka, V.V. Malyshev. Irkutsk, 2005. 112 p. (in Russian). 3
3. . Avetisov S.E. et al. Ophthalmology. National management. Moscow: GEOTAR-media Publ., 2011. 944 p. (in Russian).
4. Gnezditsky V.V. The caused potentials of a brain in clinical practice. Taganrog, TSTU Publishing house Publ., 1997. 252 p. (in Russian).
5. Gnezditsky V.V., Shamshinova A.M. Experience of use of the caused potentials in clinical practice. Moscow, MBN Publ., 2001. 472 p. (in Russian).
6. Gusev E.I. Multiple sclerosis and other diseases. Moscow, Miklosh Publ., 2004. 540 p. (in Russian).
7. Gusev E.I., Boiko A.N. et al. Demyelinating diseases of a CNS. Consilium Medicum, 2002, no. 3, pp. 12–18 (in Russian).
8. Zavalishin I.A., Peresedova A.V. Multiple sclerosis: the modern concept of a pathogenesis and pathogenetic treatment. Annals of a clinical and experimental neurology, 2007, vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 32–40 (in Russian).
9. Kovalenko A.V. Bisaga G.N, Gaykova O. N., Onishchenko L.S. Pathomorphologic changes of an optic nerve at multiple sclerosis. The Messenger of Army Medical Academy, 2011, vol. 3, pp. 126–132 (in Russian).
10. Kovalenko A.V., BisagaG.N., Odinak M.M., Krasnoshchekova E.E., Ivanov A.V. Diagnostic opportunities of a coherent tomography at patients with multiple sclerosis. The Messenger of Army Medical Academy, 2009, vol. 4, pp. 16–21 (in Russian).
11. Malov V. M., Malov I.V. Sineok E.V. VlasovYa.V. New prospects of early diagnostics of an optical neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Neurologic messenger, 2010, vol. XLII, no. 1, pp. 71–74 (in Russian).
12. Markov V.M., Leonovich A.L. Multiple sclerosis. Moscow, Medicine Publ., 1976. 274 p. (in Russian).
13. Nikiforov A.S. Gusev M.R. Neuroophthalmology: management. Мoscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2008. 624 p. (in Russian).
14. Shamshinova A.M. Wolves of Century of Century. The functional researches in an ophthalmology. Мoscow, Medicine Publ., 2002. 415 p. (in Russian).
15. Cense B. Thickness and Birefringence of Healthy Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Tissue Measured with PolarizationSensitive Optical Coherence Tomografy. Intestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2004, vol. 45, pp. 2600– 2612.
16. Fisher J.B. Relation of Visual Function to Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Multiple Sclerosis. American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 2005.
17. Houguaard J.L. Evaluation of Heredity as a Determinant of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2003, vol. 44, pp. 3011–3016
Review
For citations:
Andreyeva Ye.A. DIAGNOSTIC OPPORTUNITIES OF NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGIC INSPECTION AT RS: ROLE OF AN OPTICAL COHERENT TOMOGRAPHY AND THE VISUAL CAUSED POTENTIALS IN EARLY DIAGNOSTICS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND MONITORING OF A CONDITION OF THE VISUAL ANALYZER AT PATIENTS WITH VARIOUS OPTIONS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2013;12(5):119-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2013-5-119-125