ANALYSIS OF A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO THE APPOINTMENT OF DICK METHODS IN BIOFEEDBACK CORRECTION AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2013-2-98-103
Abstract
Goal of research: analysis of the effectiveness of Biofeedback therapy is differentiated depending on the clinical forms of autonomic dysfunction. Exchange rate control efficacy of biofeedback hardware was conducted on the dynamics of clinical andl aboratory data, surveys and assessment of the functional State of the SNC using heart rate variability, vegetative resonance test, Kerdo index definition, as well as èlektrokardiografiče applications and questionnaires, characterizing the State of psychoemotional sphere (Spilbergera–Hanina, test, Luscher). Laboratory tests include a complete blood count with evaluation of Adaptive reactions of the organism. The results of the rehabilitation complex of the patients with the use of biofeedback have confirmed its effectiveness.
About the Authors
A. G. Polyakova
Research Institute of Traumatology and Ortopaedics, Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Polyakova Alla G.
Russian Federation
Polyakova Alla G.
V. V. Matveeva
Research Institute of Traumatology and Ortopaedics, Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Matveeva Viktoriya V.
Russian Federation
Matveeva Viktoriya V.
References
1. Bayevsky R.M., Syrkin A.L. Herald of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2004, no 2, pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
2. Vasilenko A.M. Electropuncture vegetative resonance test: methodological guidelines. Moscow, 2008. 28 p. (in Russian).
3. Garkavy A.Kh., Kvakina Ye.B., Kuzmenko T.S. Antistressor reaction, and activation therapy. The reaction of activation as a way to health through the processes of self-organization. Moscow, Imedis Publ., 1998. 656 p. (in Russian).
4. Kuzmin A.G., Melnikova S.L. Herald of New Medical Technologies, 2003, vol. X, no 3, pp. 40–42. (in Russian).
5. Macheret Ye.L., Murashko N.K., Pisaruk A.V. Ukrainian Medical Journal, 2000, no. 2 (16) III/IV, pp. 89–94. (in Ukrainian).
6. Polyakova A.G., Matveyeva V.V. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 2010, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 63–67. (in Russian).
7. Polyakova A.G., Matveyeva V.V. Herald of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, 2010, pp. 406–409. (in Russian).
8. Grebneva O.L., Jafarova О.А., Shubina O.S. et al. Materials of the problem workshop «Using modern technologies in the work of psychologists of educational colonies». Novosibirsk, 2007. Pp. 9–14. (in Russian).
9. Trukhanov A.I. Ecological and physiological and medicaltechnological support of a system of Express-diagnostics and correction of the functional state of organism of dangerous professions. Dis. Dr. biol. sci. Moscow, 2007. 310 p. (in Russian).
10. Shtark M.B., Skok A.B., Shubina O.S. Biofeedback in clinical practice: materials of the 1st all-Russian conference «Biofeedback medicine and sport». Omsk, 1999. (in Russian).
11. Kérdö I. Ein aus Daten der Blutzirkulation kalkulierter Index zur Beurteilung der vegetativen Tonuslage. Acta neurovegetativa, 1966, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 250–268.
Review
For citations:
Polyakova A.G., Matveeva V.V. ANALYSIS OF A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO THE APPOINTMENT OF DICK METHODS IN BIOFEEDBACK CORRECTION AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2013;12(2):98-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2013-2-98-103
Views:
756
Email this article 