Limits on Patient Responsibility
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2006-5-67-78
Abstract
As we debate the nature and extent of patient responsibility it is important to keep in mind the reasons for giving a relatively minimal role to patient responsibility in medical ethics. It is argued that the medical profession ought to be characterized by two moral asymmetries: even if some degree of responsible behavior from patients is called for, placing the dominant emphasis on pro- fessional responsibility over patient responsibility is largely correct; insofar as we do want to encourage an increase in patient re- sponsibility, we have good reasons to emphasize prospective rather than retrospective notions of responsibility in clinical practice. Concerns about patient vulnerability along with the determined factors in disease leave little room for blame at the bedside. These two asymmetries generate normative limits on any positive account of patient responsibility.
References
1. American Medical Association (1847). Code of Ethics, Chapter 1, Article II, Obligations of patients to their physicians. Reprinted in J. Katz, The silent world of doctor and patient (p. 231—233). New York: Free Press, 1984.
2. American Medical Association (1993). Code of Ethics, On patient responsibilities. Updated June 1998, December 2000, and June 2001, Section E-10.02.
3. Anderson R., Kirk L.M. Methods of improving patient compliance in chronic disease states // Archives of Internal Medicine. 1982. № 142 (9). Р. 1673—1675.
4. Brown R.F., Butow, Ellis, Boyle, Tattersall. Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials: Describing current practice // Social Science and Medicine. 2004. № 58 (12). Р. 2445—2457.
5. Dennett D. Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Cambridge: Bradford Books, 1984.
6. Draper H., Sorell T. Patients’ responsibilities in medical ethics // Bioethics. 2002. № 16 (4). Р. 335—352.
7. Fox S., Rainie L. The online health care revolution: How the web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Pew Internet and American Life Project: Online life report. 2000. On-line. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org
8. Grisso T., Appelbaum P. Assessing competency to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
9. Harzke A.J., Williams M.L., Nilsson-Schonnesson L. et al. Psychosocial factors associated with adherence to antiretroviral medication in a sample of HIV-positive African American drug users // AIDS Care. 2004. № 16 (4). Р. 458—470.
10. Johnson M.O., Catz S.L., Remien R.H. et al. Theory-guided, empirically supported avenues for intervention on HIV medication nonadherence: Findings from the Healthy Living Project // AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2003. № 17 (12). Р. 645— 656.
11. Katz J. The silent world of doctor and patient. New York: Collier Macmillan Free Press, 1984.
12. Murray E., L.B., Pollack L., Donelan K. The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship // Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003. № 163 (14). Р. 1727—1734.
13. Ross E.A., Pittman T.B., Koo L.C. Strategy for the treatment of noncompliant hypertensive hemodialysis patients // International Journal of Artificial Organs. 2002. № 25 (11). Р. 1061—1065.
14. Schmidtz D., Goodin R.E. Social welfare and individual responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
15. Strawson P.F. Freedom and resentment. In Derk Pereboom (Ed.), Free will. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1977. P. 119—142.
16. Stewart C., Lynch A. Undue influence, consent and medical treatment // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2003. № 10 (12). Р. 598—601.
17. Van Inwagen P. The incompatibility of free will and determinism // Philosophical Studies. 1975. № 27. Р. 185—199.
18. Van Kleffens Titia. The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: A patients’ and physicians’ perspective // Social Science and Medicine. 2004. № 58 (11). Р. 2325—2336.
19. Winkelman W.J., Choo C.W. Provider-sponsored virtual communities for chronic patients: Improving health outcomes through organizational patientcentered knowledge management // Health Expectations. 2003. № 6 (4). Р. 352— 358.
Review
For citations:
Kelley M. Limits on Patient Responsibility. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2006;5(5):67-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2006-5-67-78
Views:
425
Email this article 