Preview

Bulletin of Siberian Medicine

Advanced search

Consequences of colectomy: pathogenetic damages and correction outlooks

https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2003-4-34-41

Abstract

On the base of experimental and clinical investigations there has been found that continent reservoir ileorectostomies after colectomy under the rectal contents effect had been exposed to degenerative and dysplastic mucous changes. These damages prohibit from stool formation and increase the risk of reservoir malignization. A method of continent reservoir ileorectostomy formation with restraining and areflux mechanism has been developed for pathological transformation of ileal structure. Results of morphological and instrumental investigation methods made on 33 dogs and 6 patients after colectomy show that the restraining and areflux mechanism permits to avoid displastic and degenerative changes in ileal reservoir mucous coat and to recover the stool formation due to motor-evacuation function regulation and keeping the constant physical, chemical and bacterial reservoir and rectum properties after colectomy.

About the Author

S. R. Bashirov
Томский военно-медицинский институт
Russian Federation


References

1. Баширов С.Р. Хирургическая коррекция постколэктомического синдрома способом резервуарного илеоректального анастомоза: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Томск, 2003. 24 с.

2. Брусиловский М.И. Последствия колэктомий. Кишинев, 1977. 230 с.

3. Вольвич Н.Н. Состояние тонкой кишки при неспецифическом язвенном колите после различных видов оперативных вмешательств // Клин. хир. 1986. ‹ 2. С. 14—16.

4. Джозеф М. Хендерсон. Патофизиология органов пищеварения. Пер. с англ. М.; СПб.: Бином-Невский диалект, 1997. 287 с.

5. Жерлов Г.К., Баширов С.Р. Способ резервуарного илеоректального анастомоза. Патент РФ ‹ 2138209.

6. Юхтин В.И., Хуторянский И.Н. Оценка различных типов илеоректального анастомоза после колэктомии // Хирургия. 1986. ‹ 3. С. 103—108.

7. De Silva H.J., Millard P.R., Kettewell M. Mucosal characteristic of pelvic ileal pouch. Gut 1990. V. 52. P. 6l—65.

8. Grundfest S.F., Fazio V., Weiss R.A. et al. The risk of cancer following colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for extensive mucosal ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 1981. V. 193. P. 9—14.

9. Hultén L., Willén R., Nilsson O. et al. Mucosal assessment for dysplasia and cancer in the ileal pouch mucosa in patients operated on for ulcerative colitis—a 30-year follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002. V. 45. P. 448—452.

10. Nicholls R.J., Banerjee A.K. Pouchitis: risk factors, etiology end treatment. World J. Surg. 1998. V. 22. P. 347—351.

11. Rotholtz N.A., Pikarsky A.J., Singh J.J., Wexner S.D. Adenocarcinoma arising from along the rectal stump after double-stapled ileorectal J-pouch in a patient with ulcerative colitis: the need to perform a distal anastomosis. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001. V. 44. P. 1214—1217.


Review

For citations:


Bashirov S.R. Consequences of colectomy: pathogenetic damages and correction outlooks. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2003;2(4):34-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2003-4-34-41

Views: 1101


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-0363 (Print)
ISSN 1819-3684 (Online)