MR diagnosis of fluid collections in acute interstitial pancreatitis
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2012-5-118-123
Abstract
The article analyses MR examinations of 160 patients with interstitial acute pancreatitis, in absence of MR signs of necrosis of pancreatic parenchyma; the incidence of fluid collections and their outcomes are estimated. Small single fluid collections in the first day after an attack of acute pancreatitis were revealed in 27.5% of cases, multiple and large fluid collections without signs of parenchymal necrosis were revealed in 15.6%. Follow-up MR examinations showed full resolution of peripancreatic fluid collections in 78.7% of cases. Resistant unencapsulated and partially encapsulated collections were found in 7 of 47 patients (14.9%). Local complications requiring surgical intervention developed exclusively in patients with fluid collections and amounted to 1.9% of the whole group of 160 patients, and 6.4% of patients with acute pancreatitis without signs of necrosis of pancreas and peripancreatic fat, but with fluid collections.
The authors came to the conclusion that routine MR examinations of patients with interstitial acute pancreatitis were indicated for patients with fluid collections to estimate the dynamics of changes (resolution of collections or development of complications).
About the Authors
N. A. Dyadkin
Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет, г. Москва
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Lezhnev
Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет, г. Москва
Yu. V. Yeryomin
ООО «Лечебно-диагностический центр Международного института биологических систем
им. С.М. Березина — Иваново», г. Иваново
S. Ye. Soloviyov
МБУЗ «Городская клиническая больница № 1», г. Иваново
T. V. Ivanova
МБУЗ «Городская клиническая больница № 1», г. Иваново
A. V. Shishikhin
МБУЗ «Городская клиническая больница № 1», г. Иваново
References
1. Кармазановский Г.Г. Возможности и перспективы
2. использования компьютерной томографии в диагностике острого панкреатита // Рос. журн. гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 1999. № 3. C. 15—18.
3. Balthazar E.J., Ranson J.H. C., Naidich D.P. et al. Acute-pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT // Radiology. 1985. V. 156. P. 767—772.
4. Beger H.G., Rau B., Mayer J. et al. Natural course of acute pancreatitis // World J. Surg. 1997. V. 21. P. 130—135.
5. Bradley E.L. III. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992 // Arch. Surg. 1993. V. 128. P. 586—590.
6. Bradley E.L. III., Clements J.L. Jr., Gonzalez A.C. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management // Am. J. Surg. 1979. V. 137. P. 135—141.
7. Kourtesis G., Wilson S.E., Williams R.A. The clinical signifi-cance of fluid collections in acute pancreatitis // Am. J. of Surgery. 1990. V. 56. Р. 796—799.
8. Yeo C.J., Bastidas J.A., Lynch-Nyhan A. et al. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography // Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1990. V. 170. P. 411–417.
Review
For citations:
Dyadkin N.A., Lezhnev D.A., Yeryomin Yu.V., Soloviyov S.Ye., Ivanova T.V., Shishikhin A.V. MR diagnosis of fluid collections in acute interstitial pancreatitis. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2012;11(5):118-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2012-5-118-123
Views:
618
Email this article 