Prevalence rate of structural scoliosis in school children of Novosibirsk according to the computed optical topography data
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-80-91
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to study the prevalence of structural scoliosis among 6–18 year-old school children from Novosibirsk using the computed optical topography (COMOT) data.
Materials and methods. A program of annual examination of the posture (using special developed COMOT) among school children of decreed ages, which was started in 2010 in all schools of the city, enabled data collection of more than 190,000 school children aged 6 to 18, including 49,0% girls and 51,0% foys COMOT provides reconstruction of a 3D-model of the dorsal surface of the body, assessment of the posture state, identification of structural scoliosis at an early stage, and precise determination of the scoliosis degree by angle of lateral asymmetry (LA) which is a topographic analogue of the Cobb angle.
Results. As the LA increases from 5−9º to ≥ 40º, the percentage of structural scoliosis rapidly falls from 31,1% to 0,04% in girls (G) and from 26,4% to 0,01% in boys (B), and the girls to boys ratio increases from 1,18 to 6,92. By the age of 17 years, skeletal growth in boys is generally completed; the G/B ratio for scoliosis ≥10º becomes 1,62; the rate of scolioses amounts to 5,3% (G) and 3,3% (B). The rate of scolioses ≥40º (with allowance for operated patients) has amounted to 0,24% (G) and 0,022% (B). Similar data may be expected in the adult population.
Conclusion. COMOT enabled a reliable estimation of the scoliosis severity and made it possible, unlike other screening schemes, to establish a modern system of prophylaxis of severe scoliosis forms in Novosibirsk. This biennially screening is sufficient for timely detection, follow-up and referral of a risk group to clinics.
About the Authors
V. N. SarnadskiyRussian Federation
PhD, Deputy Director,
54–31, Krulova Str., Novosibirsk, 630091
M. V. Mikhaylovskiy
Russian Federation
DM, Professor,
17, Frunze Str., Novosibirsk, 630091
T. N. Sadovaya
Russian Federation
DM, Professor,
17, Frunze Str., Novosibirsk, 630091
T. N. Orlova
Russian Federation
Doctor-orthopedist,
17, Frunze Str., Novosibirsk, 630091
S. B. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
PhD,
17, Frunze Str., Novosibirsk, 630091
References
1. Sabirin J., Bakri R., Buang S.N. et al. School scoliosis screening programme-a systematic review // Med. J. Malaysia. 2010; 65 (4): 261−267.
2. Lee J.Y., Moon S.H., Kim H.J. et al. The prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis in eleven year-old korean adolescents: a 3 year epidemiological study // Yonsei Med. J. 2014; 55 (3): 773−778.
3. Suh S.W., Modi H.N., Yang J.H., Hong J.Y. Idiopathic scoliosis in Korean schoolchildren: a prospective screening study of over 1 million children // Eur Spine J. 2011, 20: 1087−1094.
4. Kane W.J. Scoliosis Prevalence: A call for statement of term // Clinical Ortopaedics and Related Reseaarch. 1977, 126: 43−46.
5. Grivas T.B., Wade M.H., Negrini S. et al. 2011 SOSORT consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today? Available at: http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/17.
6. Willner S. Moire topography for the diagnosis and documentation of scoliosis // Acta orthop.scand. 1979, 50: 295−302.
7. Bunnell W.P. An Objective Criterion for Scoliosis Screning. // J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1984; 66-A(9): 1381−1387.
8. Stokes A.F., Moreland M.S. Concordance of Back Surface Asymmetry and Spine Shape in Idiopatic Sccoliosis. // Spine. 1989; 14: 73−78.
9. Turner-Smith A.R. A television/computer three-dimensional surface shape measurement system // J. Biomechanics. 1988; 21: 515–529.
10. Wojcik AS, Phillips GF, Mehta MH. Recording of the back surface and spinal shape by the Quantec imaging system: a new technique the scoliosis clinic // J. Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76 (Suppl I): 10–11.
11. Drerup B, Hierholzer E. Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape // Clin Biomech. 1994; 9: 28–36.
12. Sarnadski V.N., Sadovoi M.A., Formichev N.G. Computer optical topography for diagnosis of spinal deformities // Abstract of 1996 Meeting IRSSD. June 16–19. Stockholm, Sweden, 1996: 67.
13. Turner-Smith A.R., Harris J.D., Houghton G.R., Jferson R.J. A method for analysis of back shape in scoliosis. // J.Biomechanics. 1988; 21(6): 497–509.
14. Sarnadskiy V.N., Sadovoy M.A., Fomichev N.G. The way to perform computer optical topography of human body and device for its implementation. EA Patent 000111, filed 26.08.1996, publ. 27.08.1998 (in Russian).
15. Fomichev N.G., Kharinov V.N., Sarnadski V.N., Sadovoj M.A., Malakhov O.A. School spinal deformity screening by computer optical topography: A pilot study in Russia. Research into Spinal Deformities 2, I.A.F. Stokes Ed., IOS Press 59, 1999: 241.
16. Sarnadsky V.N. The structure of postural disordes and spinal deformities in age and gender according to computer optical topography. Research into Spinal Deformities
17. Proceedings of the 9th IRSSD 2012 meeting, July 1–4. Poznan, Polan, 2012 : 77–82.
18. Chowanska J., Kotwicki T., Rosadzinski K., Sliwinski Z. School screening for scoliosis: can surface topography replace examination with scoliometer? // Scoliosis. 2012; 7: 9.Аvailable at: http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/9.
19. Glinkowska В., Zukowska A, Walesiak К., Michonski J., Sitnik R., Glinkowski W. Organization, Workflow and Technical issues of school screening telediagnostics of faulty postures and scoliosis. Med-e-Tel 2013. Electronic Proceedings: The International eHealth, Telemedicine and Health ICT Forum for Educational, Networking and Business: 488–492.
20. Sarnadskiy V.N. Classification of postural disordes and spinal deformities in the three dimensions according to computer optical topography. Research into Spinal Deformities 8. Proceedings of the 9th IRSSD 2012 meeting, July 1–4. Poznan, Poland, 2012: 159–163.
21. Negrini S., Aulisa A.G., Aulisa L. et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth // Scoliosis. 2012; 7: 3.
22. Sarnadskiy V.N., Fomichev N.G., Mikhailovsky M.V. Use of functional tests to increase the efficiency of scoliosis screening diagnosis by COMOT method. Research into Spinal Deformities 4, Th.B. Grivas Ed., IOS Press 91, 2002: 204–210. Available at: http:www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/3.
23. Shands A.R., Eisbcrg H.B. The incidence of scoliosis in the state of Delaware // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br] 1955; 37: 1243–1249.
24. Lonstien J.E., Bjorklnd S., Wanninger M.H. et al. Voluntary School Screening for Scoliosis in Minnesota // J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1982; 64-A(4): 481–488.
25. Zhang H., Guo C., Tang M. et al. Prevalence of scoliosis among primary and middle school student in main china // Spine. 2014; 40 (1):41–49.
26. Hengwei F., Zifag H., Qifei W. et al. Prevalence of idiopatic scholiosis in chinese school children // Spine. 2016; 41 (3): 259–264.
Review
For citations:
Sarnadskiy V.N., Mikhaylovskiy M.V., Sadovaya T.N., Orlova T.N., Kuznetsov S.B. Prevalence rate of structural scoliosis in school children of Novosibirsk according to the computed optical topography data. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017;16(1):80-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-80-91