Modern principles of prevention of anophthalmic syndrome: formation of the locomotor stump, the types of orbital implants
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-119-131
Abstract
This article analyzes the current state of the problem of the correction of anophthalmic syndrome. Evaluated various methods of formation of the locomotor stump after removal of the eyeball, gave a detailed description of different types of materials for the fabrication of orbital implant, as well as reflect the basic principles of prevention of complications.
About the Authors
I. V. Zapuskalov
Siberian State Medical University (SSMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DM, Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology,
2, Moscow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
E. A. Gorbunova
Siberian State Medical University (SSMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Assistant of the Department of Ophthalmology,
2, Moscow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
O. I. Krivosheina
Siberian State Medical University (SSMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DM, Professor, Department of Ophthalmology,
2, Moscow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
References
1. Dushin N.V., Ivanov V.YU., SHklyaruk V.V. Problemy formirovaniya oporno-dvigatel’noy kul’ti pri udalenii glaznogo yabloka [Problems of formation of musculoskeletal stump when removing the eyeball] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmolog. 2006; 2: 36–42 (in Russian).
2. Gundorova R.А., Verigo E.N., KHarlampidi M.P. i dr. Voprosy epidemiologii i reabilitatsii lits s anoftal’mom na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Questions of Epidemiology and rehabilitation of persons with anophthalmia in the Russian Federation] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2007; 3: 42–46 (in Russian).
3. Gundorova R.А., Lazuk P.V. Znacheniye psikhologicheskoy podgotovki bol’nogo pri pokazaniyakh k udaleniyu glaznogo yabloka. Vosstanovitel’noye lecheniye pri posledstviyakh osobo tyazhelykh povrezhdeniy organa zreniya, poluchennykh v chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh: mater. nauch.-prakt [The value of psychological preparation of the patient when the indications for removing the eyeball: abstracts of conference «The value of psychological preparation of the patient when the indications for removing the eyeball»]. Moscow, 2002: 5–6 (in Russian).
4. Ibragimzade G.T. Formirovaniye opornodvigatel’noy kul’ti pri spayechno-rubtsovom protsesse kon”yunktival’noy polosti: avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk [Formation of the locomotor stump with adhesions and scars during conjunctival cavity: dis. cand. med. sci.]. Moscow, 2012: 25 (in Russian).
5. Moshetova L.K., Bendelik E.K., Аlekseyev I.B. I dr. Kontuzii glaza, klinicheskaya kharakteristika I iskhody [Contusion eye, clinical characteristics and outcomes] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 1999; 3: 10–13 (in Russian).
6. Luz’yanina V.V., Egorov V.V., Smolyakova G.P. Izucheniye svoystv implantatov dlya plastiki oporno – dvigatel’noy glaznoy kul’ti [The study of the properties of implants for plastic supporting - motor ocular stump] // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009; 12: 84–87 (in Russian).
7. Nunery W. Psychological aspects of enucleation surgery // J. Ophthalmic Prosthetics. 2002; 7: 1–8.
8. Kharlampidi M.P. Razrabotka optimal’nykh sposobov enukleatsii dlya uluchsheniya kosmeticheskikh pokazateley glaznogo protezirovaniya: аvtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk [Development of optimal methods of enucleation to improve the cosmetic indicators of ocular prosthetics: dis. kand. med. sci.]. Moscow, 2002: 24 (in Russian).
9. Druyanova YU. S., Valeyeva R. G., Gudkova E.V. Formirovaniye kul’ti posle enukleatsii [Formation of the stump after enucleation] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 1990; 6: 28–29 (in Russian).
10. Nikolayenko V.P., Аstakhov Yu.S. Sovremennyye poristyye materialy dlya izgotovleniya orbital’nykh implantatov [Modern materials for the manufacture of porous orbital implants] // Oftal’mologicheskiye vedomosti – Ophthalmology journal. 2008; 1 (2): 35–40 (in Russian).
11. Tikhonov S.G. Mediko-sotsial’nyye aspekty anoftal’ma: аvtoref. ... kand. med. nauk [Health and social aspects of anophthalmos: dis. cand. med. sci.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2003: 26 (in Russian).
12. Filatova I.А. Sovremennyy podkhod k khirurgicheskoy reabilitatsii patsiyentov s anoftal’micheskim sindromom [Modern approach to surgical rehabilitation of patients with anophthalmic syndrome] // Oftal’mokhirurgiya – The Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2002; 1: 49–53 (in Russian).
13. Katayev M.G., Filatova I.А. Osobennosti enukleatsii glaza v sovremennykh usloviyakh. Vosstanovitel’noye lecheniye pri posledstviyakh osobo tyazhelykh povrezhdeniy organa zreniya, poluchennykh v chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh: mater. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Especially the enucleation of the eye in modern conditions. Restorative treatment the consequences of severe damage to the organ of vision obtained in emergency situations]. Moscow, 2002: 59–60 (in Russian).
14. Custer P.L., Kennedy R.H., Woog J.J. et al. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology // Ophthalmology. 2003; 110 (10): 2054–2061.
15. Danilenko А.S. Evistseratsiya glaza s ispol’zovaniyem vkladysha iz keramicheskogo gidroksiapatita i membran «Tutoplast». VIII s”yezd oftal’mologov Rossii: tez. dokl. [Evisceration of the eye, using the liner from a ceramic hydroxyapatite and membranes “Tutoplast”. VIII Congress of ophthalmologists of Russia]. Moscow, 2005: 644–645 (in Russian).
16. Filatova I.А., Katayev M.G., KHarlampidi M.P. Sravnitel’nyy analiz rezul’tatov udaleniya glaznogo yabloka razlichnymi sposobami: mater. nauch.-praktich. konf. «Sovremennyye tekhnologii v diagnostike i khirurgicheskom lechenii oskolochnykh raneniy glaza i orbity» [Comparative analysis of the results of removal of the eyeball in various ways: abstracts of conference «Modern technologies in diagnostics and surgical treatment of shrapnel wounds of eye and orbit» Moscow, 2001: 141–143 (in Russian).
17. Dresner S.C., Karesh J.W. Primary implant placement with evisceration in patients with endophthalmitis // Ophthalmology. 2000; 107 (9): 1661–1664.
18. Krasil’nikova V.L. Mediko-sotsial’naya reabilitatsiya patsiyentov s anoftal’mom s pomoshch’yu kompozitsionnogo oftal’mologicheskogo implantata (kliniko- eksperimental’noye issledovaniye): аvtoref. dis. dokt. med. nauk [Medico-social rehabilitation of patients with anophthalmia using composite ophthalmic implant (clinical and experimental study): dis. dr. med. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2007: 41 (in Russian).
19. Sosnovskiy S.V., Kulikov А.N., Shamrey D.V. Novyy sposob formirovaniya oporno-dvigatel’noy kul’ti glaznogo yabloka dlya kosmeticheskoy reabilitatsii patsiyentov v iskhode tyazheloy travmy glaza [New method of formation of musculoskeletal stump of the eyeball for cosmetic rehabilitation of patients in outcome of serious eye injuries] // Prakticheskaya meditsina – Practical medicine. 2012; 2(4): 208–213 (in Russian).
20. Cheglakov P.YU. Formirovaniye oporno-dvigatel’noy kul’ti pri evistseroenukleatsii i endoprotezirovanii s primeneniyem implantata dlya povysheniya podvizhnosti glaznogo proteza: аvtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk [The formation of the musculoskeletal stump when visceromegaly and arthroplasty with the use of the implant to increase the mobility of eye prosthesis. Dis. ... kand. med. sci.]. Moscow, 2005: 12 (in Russian).
21. Shlyakhtov M.I., Takhchidi Kh.P. Sposob zadney evistsero-enukleatsii s sokhraneniyem perednego otrezka fibroznoy kapsuly glaza. 2-ya Evro-aziatskaya konferentsiya po oftal’mokhirurgii: sb. nauch. tr. [Way back eviscero-enucleation with preservation of the anterior segment of the fibrous capsule of the eye. 2nd Euro-Asian conference on ophthalmosurgery]. Ekaterinburg, 2001: 281–282 (in Russian).
22. Shlyakhtov M.I. Sposob sozdaniya oporno-dvigatel’noy kul’ti metodom evistseratsii s rezektsiyey zadnego polyusa pri buftal’me. Rossiyskiy simpozium po refraktsionnoy i plasticheskoy khirurgii: sb. nauch. st. [The process of creating the locomotor stump by evisceration with resection of the posterior pole with buphthalmos. Russian symposium on refractive and cosmetic surgery]. Moscow, 2002: 251–253 (in Russian).
23. Anderson R.L., Yen M.T. Capsular calcification of alloplastic orbital implants // Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2002; 133: 289–290.
24. Anderson R.L., Yen M.T., Lucci L.M. The quasi-integrated porous polyethylene orbital implant // Ophtal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2002; 18: 50–55.
25. Grachev N.N., Vasil’yeva S.F., Novyye vozmozhnosti povysheniya kosmeticheskogo effekta protezirovaniya posle enukleatsii. Glaznoye protezirovaniye i plasticheskaya khirurgiya v oblastiorbity: sb. nauch. tr. [New features enhance the cosmetic effect of prosthesis after enucleation. Ocular prosthetics and plastic surgery of the orbit.]. Moscow, 1987: 56–58 (in Russian).
26. Muldashev E.R., Muslimov S.А., Salikhov А.YU. Аllotransplantaty dlya oftal’mokhirurgii [Allografts for ophthalmic surgery].Ufa, Gilem Publ., 1987: 30.
27. Filatova I.А. Аnoftal’m. Patologiya i lecheniye [The anophthalmos. Pathology and treatment]. Moscow, MNTS Publ., 2007: 213 (in Russian).
28. Filatova I.А. Osobennosti implantatsii materiala Karbotekstima-M v plasticheskoy oftal’mokhirurgii [Features implant material Karbotekstima-M in plastic ophthalmic surgery] // Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2001; 2 (3): 107–110 (in Russian).
29. Rubin P.A. D., Popham J.K., Shore J.W. A new enucleation implant: conical shape with superior sulcus support // Abstract book of 13-th meeting of ESOPRS. Rostock; Venue, 1995: 114–115.
30. Davydov D.V. Mediko-biologicheskiye aspekty kompleksnogo ispol’zovaniya biomaterialov u patsiyentov s anoftal’mom: avtoref. dis. dokt. med. nauk [Medical and biological aspects of the integrated use of biomaterials in patients with anophthalmia. dis. dr. med. sci.]. Moscow, 2000: 46 (in Russian).
31. Suter A.J., Molteno A.C., Bevin T.H. et al. Long term follow up of bone derived hydroxyapatite orbital implants // Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002; 86: 1287–1292.
32. Retout A., De Bokay E. Treatment of the deep superior eyelid sulcus in the anophthalmic socket: abstract book of 13th Meeting of ESOPRS. Rostock, 1995: 112.
33. Grusha YA.O., Fedorov А.А., Bakayeva T.V. Sravnitel’noye eksperimental’noye issledovaniye sovremennykh implantatsionnykh materialov, primenyayemykh v khirurgii orbity [Comparative experimental study of modern implant materials used in surgery of the orbit] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2012; 128 (2): 27–33 (in Russian).
34. Custer P.L., Trinkaus K.M. Porous implant exposure: incidence, management and morbidity // Ophthalm. Plast. And Reconst. Surg. 2007; 23 (1): 1–7.
35. Karcioglu Z.A., Al-Mesfer S.A., Mullaney P.B. Extrusion of porous polyethylene implant in recurrent retinoblastoma // Ophthalm. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998; 14 (1): 37–44.
36. Sverdlov D.G. Novyy metod obrazovaniya kul’ti posle enukleatsii putem peresadki v tenonovu kapsulu trupnogo khryashcha [A new method for the formation of the stump after enucleation by transplanting into the Tenon’s capsule cadaveric cartilage] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 1941; 19 (5–6): 46–50 (in Russian).
37. Mikhel’son E.M. Trupnyy khryashch kak material dlya svobodnoy plastiki [Corpse as a material for cartilage-free plastic] // Khirurgiya. 1939; 10: 29–34 (in Russian).
38. Tsurova L.M., Milyudin E.S. Sravnitel’nyy analiz ispol’zovaniya razlichnykh orbital’nykh implantatov dlya formirovaniya post·enukleatsionnoy oporno – dvigatel’noy kul’ti [Comparative analysis of the use of various orbital implants postinoculation for the formation of the locomotor stump] // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014; 12: 334–337 (in Russian).
39. Sirotkina I.А. Vozmozhnosti prognozirovaniya rezul’tatov glaznogo protezirovaniya pri provedenii organounosyashchikh operatsiy [Possibilities of forecasting the results of the ocular prosthesis when conducting organolead operations] // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011; 14 (133): 331–336 (in Russian).
40. Krasil’nikova V.L. Аnaliz transplantatsionnykh materialov, ispol’zuyemykh dlya sozdaniya oporno-dvigatel’noy kul’ti glaznogo proteza pri anoftal’me [Analysis of graft materials used to create musculoskeletal limb prosthetic eye with anophthalmia] // Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2005; 4: 5–11 (in Russian).
41. Aryasit O., Preechawai P. Indications and results in anophthalmic socket reconstruction using dermis - fat graft // Clin. Ophthalmol. 2015; 9: 795–799.
42. Grusha YA.O., Fedorov А.А., Baranov P.YU. i dr. Issledovaniye prostranstvennoy struktury I biointegrativnykh kharakteristik orbital’nykh poristykh implantatsionnykh materialov [The study of the spatial structure and biointegrativnyh orbital characteristics of porous implant materials] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2010; 126 (5): 9–13 (in Russian).
43. Jordan D.R., Gilberg S., Bawazeer A. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye) : experience with 158 patients // Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2004; 20 (1): 69–74.
44. Grusha O.V., Primeneniye kapronovoy tkani pri operatsiyakh na vekakh i pri enukleatsii [The use of nylon fabric with operations on the eyelids and enucleation] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 1960; 1: 27–33 (in Russian).
45. Filatova I.А., Katayev M.G. Odnomomentnoye vypolneniye enukleatsii i plastiki polosti pri eye deformatsii [Simultaneously performing enucleation and plastic cavity in its deformation] // Аktual’nyye problemy oftal’mologii – Vital problems of ophthalmology. 999;
46. : 451–452 (in Russian).
47. Bessonova L.А., Poltanova T.I. Klinicheskoye nablyudeniye ottorzheniya implantata «Karbotekstim-M» v otdalennom posleoperatsionnom periode. Tochka Zreniya. Vostok – Zapad: mat-lyyubil. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashchennoy 15-letiyu Kirovskoyklinich. oftal’m. bol’nitsy «Dobryye sosedi» [Clinical observation of rejection of the implant “Karbotekstim-M” in the late postoperative period. «East West» Proceedings of the International Scientific Meeting]. Kirov, 2014; 2: 21–22 (in Russian).
48. Ivolgina I.V. Osobennosti primeneniya razlichnykh implantatov pri formirovanii oporno-dvigatel’noy kul’ti posle enukleatsii [Features of the application of different implants in the formation of the locomotor stump after enucleation] // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennyye I tekhnicheskiye nauki – Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences. 2015; 20 (3): 577–579 (in Russian).
49. Chuo J.Y., Dolman P.J., Ng T.L. et al. Clinical and histopathologic review of 18 explanted porous polyethylene orbital implants // Ophthalmology. 2009; 116 (2): 349–354.
50. Choi J.C., Iwamato M.A., Bstandig S. et al. Medpor motility coupling post: a rabbit model // Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1999; 15: 190–201.
51. Naik M.N., Murthy R.K., Honavar S.G. Comparison of vascularization of Medpor and Medpor-Plus orbital implants: a prospective, randomized study // Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007; 23 (6): 463–467.
52. Blaydon S. M., Shepler T.R., Neuhaus R. W. et al. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases // Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2003; 19: 364–371.
53. Sadiq S.A., Mengher L.S., Lowry J.et al. Integrated orbital implants - a comparison of hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants // Orbit. 2008; 27 (1): 37–40.
54. Chen Y.H., Cui H.G. High density porous polyethylene material (Medpor) as an unwrapped orbital implant // J. Zhejiang. Univ. Sci. B. 2006; 7 (8): 679–682.
55. Rozanova I.B. Biosovmestimost’ [Biocompatibility]. Moscow, ITSVNIIgeosistem Publ., 1999: 352 (in Russian).
56. Shekhter А.B., Rozanova I.B. Tkanevaya reaktsiya na implantat [Tissue reaction to the implant]. Moscow, ITSVNIIgeosistem Publ., 1999: 174 (in Russian).
57. Sokolov V.А., Sevost’yanov А.E., Petrova M.S. i dr. Pervyy opyt primeneniya politetraftor·etilenovykh implantatov v glaznom protezirovanii v Ryazanskoy klinike [The first experience of using polytetrafluoroethylene implants ocular prosthesis clinic in Ryazan] // Vostok – Zapad. Tochka zreniya - East – West. Point of view. 2014; 1: 261–262 (in Russian).
58. Serdyuk V.N., Volok S.I. Modifitsirovannaya metodika zadney evistseratsii s implantatsiyey intraorbital’nogo vkladysha iz politetraftor·etilena «Ekoflon» [The modified technique of evisceration with posterior intraorbital implantation liner PTFE “ECOFLON”] // Vostok – Zapad. Tochka zreniya – East – West. Point of view. 2014; 1: 260–261 (in Russian).
59. Berezovskaya А.А. Ispol’zovaniye implantatov na osnove nikelida titana pri lecheniit yazhelykh otsloyek setchatki. Avtoref. dis.kand. med. nauk [The use of implants on the basis ofNiTi in the treatment of severe retinal detachments. Diss. kand. med. sci.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2001: 24 (in Russian).
60. Gyunter V.E. Zakonomernosti deformatsionnogo povedeniya metallicheskikh meditsinskikh materialov i implantatov: sbornik trudov mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Materialy i implantaty s pamyat’yu formy v meditsine» [The patterns of deformation behavior of metallic medical materials and implants. The materials and implants with shape memory in medicine]. Tomsk, 2014: 7–16 (in Russian).
61. Itin V.I., Pribytkov G.А., Kнlusov I.А. i dr. Implantat – nositel’ kletochnogo materiala iz poristogo pronitsayemogo titana [Implant – carrier cellular material of porous permeable titanium] // Kletochnaya transplantologiya i tkanevaya inzheneriya – Genes & Cells. 2006; 5 (3): 59–63 (in Russian).
62. Gyunter V.E., Kнodorenko V.N., CHekalkin T.L. Meditsinskiye materialy s pamyat’yu formy. Meditsinskiye materialy i implantaty s pamyat’yu formy [Medical materials with shape memory. Medical Materials and Implants with Shape Memory]. Tomsk, NPP MITS Publ., 2011; 1: 534 (in Russian).
63. Gyunter V.E. Metodologicheskiye osobennosti deformatsionnogo povedeniya metallicheskikh meditsinskikh materialov I implantatov: metodicheskoye posobiye [Methodological features of the deformation behavior of metallic materials and medical implants]. Tomsk, MITS Publ., 2013: 32 (in Russian).
64. Gyunter V.E. Problemy metallovedeniya v meditsine I osobennosti deformatsionnogo povedeniya sverkh·elastichnykh materialov i implantatov s pamyat’yu formy [Metallurgy problems in medicine and especially superelastic deformation behavior of materials and implants with shape memory] // Implantaty s pamyat’yu formy. 2012; 1–2: 98–109 (in Russian).
65. Dambayev G.TS., Gyunter V.E., Radionchenko А.А. i dr. Poristyye pronitsayemyye sverkh·elastichnyye implantaty v khirurgii [The porous permeable superelastic implants surgery].Tomsk, Izd-vo TPU Publ., 1996: 174 (in Russian).
66. Yakovchuk V.V., Kurochkin V.N., Sakhnov S.N. i dr. Nekotoryye aspekty primeneniya splavov nikelida titana v oftal’mokhirurgii [Some aspects of the use of alloy NiTi in ophthalmic surgery] // Implantaty s pamyat’yu formy. 1991; 3: 15–16 (in Russian).
67. Yakovchuk V.V., Steblyuk А.N. Implantatsiya poristogo nikelida titana pri povtornykh antiglaukomatoznykh operatsiyakh [Implantation of porous NiTi with repeated operations antiglaukomatoznyh] // Implantaty s pamyat’yu formy. 1994; 1: 22–24 (in Russian).
68. Medvedev Yu.А., Shamanayev S.V., Shamanayeva L.S. i dr. Taktika khirurgicheskogo lecheniya travmaticheskikh povrezhdeniy sredney zony litsa na osnove primeneniya implantatov iz setchatogo nikelida titana [Surgical treatment of traumatic injuries of the midface through the use of implants made of mesh titanium nickelide] // Tikhookeanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal – Pacific Medical Journal. 2003; 1: 78–79 (in Russian).
69. Filatova I.А., Katayev M.G., KHarb А.KH. Obnazheniye orbital’nykh implantatov : prichiny i lecheniye [Exposure of orbital implants: causes and treatment] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2008; 124 (3): 36–41 (in Russian).
70. Sundelin K.C., Dafgard Kopp E.M. Complications associated with secondary orbital implantations [Electronic resource] // Acta Ophthalmol. 2015. URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.12818/full.
71. Grusha YA.O., Fedorov А.А., Dzemeshkevich V.V., Blinova I.V. Kliniko-morfologicheskiye osobennosti ispol’zovaniya ksenoperikarda pri plastike vek I orbity [Clinico-morphological features use ksenoperikarda when Eyelid and orbit] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2004; 5: 19–21 (in Russian).
72. Filatova I.А. Sovremennyye aspekty khirurgicheskogo lecheniya pri anoftal’me [Modern aspects of surgical treatment for anophthalmos] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2002; 1: 20–25 (in Russian).
73. Arat Y.O., Shetlar D.J., Boniuk M. Bovine pericardium versus homologous sclera as a wrapping for hydroxyapatite orbital implants // Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2003; 19 (3): 189–193.
74. Gayre G.S. Bovine pericardium as a wrapping for orbital implants // Ophthalm. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001; 17 (5): 381–387.
75. Inkster C.F., Ng S.G., Leatherbarrow B., Primary banked scleral patch graft in the prevention of exposure of hydroxyapatite orbital implants // Ophthalmology. 2002; 109 (2): 389–392.
76. Tambe K., Pushpoth S., Mudhar H.S. et al. A histopathologic study of orbital implant vascularization // Orbit. 2009; 28 (1): 50–57.
77. Cui H.G., Li H.Y. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on the treatment of exposure of the orbital implants // J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2007; 8 (9): 620–625.
78. Elabjer B. Kuzmanovic, Busic M., Bosnar D. et al. Our experience with dermofat graft in reconstruction of anophthalmic socket // Orbit. 2010; 29 (4): 209–212.
79. Delmas J., Adenis J.P., Robert P.Y. et al. Repair of orbital implant exposure using Müller’s muscle flap // J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 2014; 37 (8): 618–622.
80. Turner L.D, Haridas A.S., Sullivan T.J. The versatility of the temporoparietalfascial graft (TPFG) in orbital implant exposure // Orbit. 2014; 33 (5): 352–355.
81. Vagefi, M.R., McMullan T.F., Burroughs J.R. et al. Autologous dermis graft at the time of evisceration or enucleation // Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007; 91 (11): 1528–1531.
82. Milyudin E.S., Zolotarev А.V. Аmnioplastika v sovremennoy oftal’mologii [Amnioplastika in modern ophthalmology. VIII Vseross. nauch.-praktich. konf. «Fedorovskiye chteniya – 2009» [VIII All-Russia. scientific-practical. Conf. “Fyodorov Readings - 2009”]. Moscow, 2009: 508–509 (in Russian).
83. Polyanskaya N.K. Transplantatsiya amnioticheskoy membrany v oftal’mologii [Amniotic membrane transplantation in ophthalmology] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2008; 2: 60–62 (in Russian).
84. Chen Y. H., Cui H. G. Amniotic membrane transplantation for porous sphere orbital implant exposure // J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2007; 8 (9): 616–619.
85. Jordan D.R., Klapper S.R., Gilberg S.M. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures // Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2003; 19 (1): 53–61.
86. Viswanathan P., Sagoo M.S., Olver J.M. UK national survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends // Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007; 91 (5): 616–619.
87. Bakayeva T.V., Grusha YA.O. Materialy, primenyayemyye v khirurgii orbity [Materials used in surgery orbit] // Vestnik oftal’mologii – Annals of Ophthalmology. 2010; 2: 46–50 (in Russian).
88. Kamal S., Kumar S., Goel R. Autologous serum for anterior tissue necrosis after porous orbital implant // Middle East Afr. J. Ophthalmol. 2014; 21 (2): 193–195.
Review
For citations:
Zapuskalov I.V., Gorbunova E.A., Krivosheina O.I. Modern principles of prevention of anophthalmic syndrome: formation of the locomotor stump, the types of orbital implants. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017;16(1):119-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-119-131
Views:
1205
Email this article 