Vascular prostheses used in infrainguinal arterial reconstruction
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-132-139
Abstract
The aim of this article to discuss about modern vascular prostheses which used in reconstructive surgery. The treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease is one of the most relevant sections of vascular surgery. Up to 65% of all cases, affected femoropopliteal segment. Surgical revascularization plays a center role in the treatment of peripheral artery disease. This article provides a classification of vascular grafts, analyzed their shortcomings and advantages, describes the prospects for their development. Unfortunately, despite the technical advances, has not yet developed an ideal vascular prosthesis. Thus there is a need of search for new materials and modifications of available materials, with the goal of creating a prosthesis for properties close to ideal.
About the Authors
A. O. Ivchenko
Siberian State Medical University (SSMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DM, Head of the Department of Surgery,
2, Moskow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
A. N. Shvedov
Siberian State Medical University (SSMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student,
2, Moskow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
O. A. Ivchenko
Siberian State Medical University (SSMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DM, Professor, Department of Surgery,
2, Moskow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
References
1. Shoyhet Y. N., Horev N. G. Angiologiya i sosudistaya hirurgiya [Angiology and vascular surgery]. Barnaul: Printehkspress Publ., 2009: 448 (in Russian).
2. Diehm, Kareem, Lawall. Epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease // Vasa. 2004; 33 (4): 183–189 DOI:10.1024/0301-1526.33.4.183.
3. Pokrovskiy A. V. Klinicheskaya angiologiya [Clinical angiology]. M.: Medicina Publ., 2004: 1 (in Russian).
4. Bokeriya L. A., Spiridonov A. A., Abalmasov K. G., Morozov K. M. Mikrohirurgiya pri porazhenii arteriy distalnogo rusla nizhney konechnosti [Microsurgery in peripheral artery disease]. M.: NCSSKH im AN Bakuleva RAMN Publ., 2004: 55 (in Russian).
5. Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery / Ed. E. Ascher. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012: 1317.
6. Pokrovskiy A. V., Gontarenko V. N. Sostoyanie sosudistoy hirurgii v Rossii v 2014 godu [State of vascular surgery in Russia in 2014]. M.: Rossiyskoe obshchestvo angiologov i sosudistyh hirurgov Publ., 2015: 99 (in Russian).
7. Gluck T. Die moderne Chirurgie des Circulation sapparates // Berl. Klin. Wschr. 1898; 70: 1–29.
8. Carrel A. The surgery of blood vessels etc. // Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin. 1907; 18(190): 18–28.
9. M Sriram B. SRB’s Surgical Operations: Text and Atlas. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2014: 1340.
10. Kwon H., Hong J.P., Han Y., Park H., Song G.-W., Kwon T.-W., Cho Y.-P. Use of cryopreserved cadaveric arterial allograft as a vascular conduit for peripheral arterial graft infection // Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research. 2015; 89 (1): 51. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2015.89.1.51.
11. Castier Y., Francis F., Cerceau P., Besnard M., Albertin J., Fouilhe L., Cerceau O., Albaladejo P., Lesèche G. Cryopreserved arterial allograft reconstruction for peripheral graft infection // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2005; 41 (1): 30–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.025.
12. Ward A.S., Cormier J.M. Operative Techniques in Arterial Surgery. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986: 412.
13. Palcev M. A. Biologiya stvolovyh kletok i kletochnye tekhnologii [Biology of stem cells and biotechnology]. M.: Medicina Publ., 2009 (in Russian).
14. Eschenhagen T. Engineering Myocardial Tissue // Circulation Research. 2005; 97(12): 1220–1231. DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000196562.73231.7d.
15. Barbarash L.S., Ivanov S.V., Zhuravleva I. Y, Anufriev A.I., Kazachek Y.V., Kudryavceva Y.A., Zinec M.G. 12-letniy opyt ispolzovaniya bioprotezov dlya zameshcheniya infraingvinalnyh arteriy [12 years of experience in the use of bioprosthesis for replacing of infrainguinal arteries] // Angiologiya i sosudistaya hirurgiya – Angiology and vascular surgery. 2006; 12 (3): 91–97 (in Russian).
16. Kennealey P.T., Elias N., Hertl M., Ko D.S.C., Saidi R.F., Markmann J.F., Smoot E.E., Schoenfeld D.A., Kawai T. A prospective, randomized comparison of bovine carotid artery and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for permanent hemodialysis vascular access // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2011; 53 (6): 1640–1648. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.008.
17. Harlander-Locke M., Jimenez J.C., Lawrence P.F., Gelabert H.A., Derubertis B.G., Rigberg D.A., Farley S.M. Bovine Carotid Artery (Artegraft) as a Hemodialysis Access Conduit in Patients Who Are Poor Candidates for Native Arteriovenous Fistulae // Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2014; 48(7–8): 497–502. DOI: 10.1177/1538574414561231.
18. Lu T., Anaya-Ayala J.E., Reardon M.J., Peden E.K., Davies M.G. Right Brachial to Atrial Xenograft Conduit for Hemodialysis Access: A Case Report // Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2015; 29 (8): 1662.e13-1662.e18. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.05.036.
19. Boccafoschi F., Botta M., Fusaro L., Copes F., Ramella M., Cannas M. Decellularized biological matrices: an interesting approach for cardiovascular tissue repair and regeneration // Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2015; P. n/a-n/a. DOI: 10.1002/term.2103.
20. Zorin V.L., Zorina A.I., Cherkasov V.R. Analiz zarubezhnogo rynka regenerativnoy mediciny[Analysis of a foreign market of regenerative medicine] // Kletochnaya transplantologiya i tkanevaya inzheneriya – Cells transplantology and tissue engineering. 2009; 4 (3): 68–78 (in Russian).
21. Ahmedov S. D., Afanasev S. A., Egorova M. V., Andreev S. L., Ivanov A. V., Rogovskaya Y. V., Usov V. Y., SHvedov A. N., Steinhoff G. Ispolzovanie beskletochnogo kollagenovogo matriksa v kachestve platformy dlya izgotovleniya krovenosnyh sosudov v serdechno-sosudistoy hirurgii [Cell-free collagen-based scaffolds used for making blood vessels in cardiovascular surgery] // Angiologiya i sosudistaya hirurgiya – Angiology and vascular surgery. 2012; 18 (2): 7–12 (in Russian).
22. Ahmedov S.D., Afanasev S.A., Egorova M.V., Andreev S.L., Ivanov A.V., Rogovskaya Y.V., Usov V.Y., SHvedov A.N., Steinhoff G. Tkanevaya inzheneriya v ehksperimentalnoy serdechno-sosudistoy hirurgii tekhnologiya polucheniya beskletochnyh kollagenovyh matriksov sosudov zhivotnyh i cheloveka [Tissue engineering in experimental cardio-vascular surgery: technology of preparation of acellular collagen matrix of animal and human vessels] // Kletochnaya transplantologiya i tkanevaya inzheneriya – Cells transplantology and tissue engineering. 2011; 6 (1): 69–72 (in Russian).
23. Fichelle J.-M., Cormier F., Franco G., Luizy F. Sur quels arguments un segment veineux est-il utilisable pour un pontage ? Revue générale // Journal des Maladies Vasculaires. 2010; 35(3): 155–161 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmv.2010.01.076.
24. Twine C.P., McLain A.D. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery / Ed. C.P. Twine, Chichester. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2010.
25. Klinkert P., Post P., Breslau P., Bockel J. Saphenous Vein Versus PTFE for Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass. A Review of the Literature // European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2004; 27 (4): 357–362 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.027.
26. Donker J.M.W., Ho G.H., Slaa A. te, Groot H.G.W. de, Waal J.C.H. van der, Veen E.J., Laan L. v. d. Midterm Results of Autologous Saphenous Vein and ePTFE PreCuffed Bypass Surgery in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease // Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2011; 45 (7): 598–603 DOI: 10.1177/1538574411414923.
27. Sarwar U., Chetty G., Sarkar P. The short saphenous vein: A viable alternative conduit for coronary artery bypass grafts harvested using a novel technical approach // Journal of Surgical Technique and Case Report. 2012; 4 (1): 61 DOI: 10.4103/2006-8808.100359.
28. Harris R.W., Andros G., Dulawa L.B., Oblath R.W., Salles-Cunha S.X., Apyan R. Successful long-term limb salvage using cephalic vein bypass grafts // Annals of surgery. 1984; 200 (6): 785–792 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198412000-00019.
29. Purohit M., Dunning J. Do coronary artery bypass grafts using cephalic veins have a satisfactory patency? // Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2006; 6 (2): 251–254. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2006.149104.
30. Dardik A., Dardik H. Umbilical Vein Grafts for Lower Limb Revascularization. London: Springer London, 2011: 189–198.
31. McMonagle M., Stephenson M. Vascular and endovascular surgery at a glance. Wiley-Blackwell, 2014: 160.
32. Sheehan S.J., Rajah S.M., Kester R.C. Effect of preclotting on the porosity and thrombogenicity of knitted Dacron® grafts // Biomaterials. 1989; 10(2): 75–79 DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(89)90034-3.
33. Zelt D.T., Abbott W.M. Vascular prostheses // Oxford Textbook of Surgery. Ed. P.J. Morris, R.A. Malt. Oxford University Press, 1994: 349–353.
34. Advances in cardiovascular engineering / Ed. M.R.T. Hwang, H.C. Ned, Turitto, T. Vincent Yen. Springer US, 1992: 443.
35. Ravi S., Qu Z., Chaikof E.L. Polymeric Materials for Tissue Engineering of Arterial Substitutes // Vascular. 2009; 17(Supplement 1): S45–S54 DOI: 10.2310/6670.2008. 00084.
36. Takagi H., Goto S., Matsui M., Manabe H., Umemoto T. A contemporary meta-analysis of Dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femoropopliteal bypass grafting // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2010; 52(1): 232–236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.010.
37. Roll S., Müller-Nordhorn J., Keil T., Scholz H., Eidt D., Greiner W., Willich S.N. Dacron® vs. PTFE as bypass materials in peripheral vascular surgery – systematic review and meta-analysis // BMC Surgery. 2008; 8 (1): 22 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-8-22.
38. Rychlik I.J., Davey P., Murphy J., O’Donnell M.E. A meta-analysis to compare Dacron versus polytetrafluroethylene grafts for above-knee femoropopliteal artery bypass // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2014; 60 (2): 506–515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.049.
Review
For citations:
Ivchenko A.O., Shvedov A.N., Ivchenko O.A. Vascular prostheses used in infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017;16(1):132-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-132-139
Views:
3360
Email this article 