The first clinical case of implantation of a composite frame xenopericardial bioprosthesis “MedEng-Bio” in the mitral position
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2018-4-281-286
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The article presents the first clinical case of the implantation of a composite frame xenopericardial bioprosthesis “MedEng-Bio” in the mitral position. The special design of the prosthesis implantation procedure simplifies and reduces the risks associated with possible repeated operations.
About the Authors
B. N. KozlovRussian Federation
Kozlov Boris N., DM, Leading Researcher, OSSH, Head of Cardiac Surgery Department No. 1, Research Institute of Cardiology, TNMRC RAS; SSMU
111a, Kievskаya Str., Tomsk, 634050, 2, Moscow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
K. A. Petlin
Russian Federation
Petlin Konstantin A., PhD, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Cardiac Surgery Department No. 1
111a, Kievskаya Str., Tomsk, 634050
A. S. Pryakhin
Russian Federation
Pryakhin Andrey S., Postgraduate Student, Department Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskаya Str., Tomsk, 634050
A. V. Schedrin
Russian Federation
Shchedrin Anton V., Resident, Department Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskаya Str., Tomsk, 634050
D. S. Panflov
Russian Federation
Panfilov Dmitry S., PhD, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Cardiac Surgery Department No. 1
111a, Kievskаya Str., Tomsk, 634050
V. M. Shipulin
Russian Federation
Shipulin Vladimir M., DM, Professor, Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, TNMRC RAS; SSMU
111a, Kievskаya Str., Tomsk, 634050, 2, Moscow Trakt, Tomsk, 634050
References
1. Starr A., Edwards M.L. Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball valve prosthesis. Ann. Surg. 1961; 154: 726.
2. Bockeria L.A., Gudkova R.G. Cardiovascular Surgery - 2015. Diseases and congenital anomalies of the circulatory system. M., 2016 (in Russ.).
3. Foroutan F. et al. Prognosis after surgical replacement with a bioprosthetic aortic valve in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: systematic review of observational studies. BMJ. 2016: 354. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5065.
4. Khan S.et al. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2001; 122 (2): 257-269.
5. Akins C. et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008; 85 (4): 1490-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.082.
6. Azadani A.N., Tseng E.E. Transcatheter heart valves for failing bioprostheses state-of-the-art review of Valve-in-Valve Implantation. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011; 4 (6): 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.964478.
7. Reed A. Siemieniuk, transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016; 354: i5130. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5130.
Review
For citations:
Kozlov B.N., Petlin K.A., Pryakhin A.S., Schedrin A.V., Panflov D.S., Shipulin V.M. The first clinical case of implantation of a composite frame xenopericardial bioprosthesis “MedEng-Bio” in the mitral position. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2018;17(4):281-286. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2018-4-281-286
ISSN 1819-3684 (Online)