WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2014-5-179-183
Abstract
Analysis of the current literature showed that in publications, in our opinion, there is no master: a scientific analysis of the reasons behind the decline in the quality of knowledge of the doctor, as well as the scientific basis of modern pedagogical technologies introduced in the process of training future doctors to address this problem. Objective and subjective factors are having a negative effect on the quality of the doctor's knowledge. The generally accepted methods of assessing the quality of knowledge – testing and rating system – have their limitations. Testing reflects the level of knowledge about the thinking style of the originator of test tasks. Ranking system for assessing knowledge increasingly characterized by diligence in studying medicine. It is proposed to upgrade the quality of medical knowledge in the teaching of the theory of integration of diagnostics. Amount of knowledge to evaluate the content of educational narrative history of the disease. The quality of the knowledge to assess the content of professional clinical picture comment in the history of the disease.
About the Authors
F. F. Tetenev
Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Tetenev Fyodor F.
Russian Federation
Tetenev Fyodor F.
T. N. Bodrova
Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Bodrova Tamara N.
Russian Federation
Bodrova Tamara N.
A. I. Karzilov
Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Karzilov Aleksandr I.
Russian Federation
Karzilov Aleksandr I.
K. F. Tetenev
Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Tetenev Konstantin F.
Russian Federation
Tetenev Konstantin F.
References
1. Tetenev F.F. What is the theory of diagnosis. Klinicheskaya meditsina – Clinical Medicine, 1996, no. 3, pp. 73–74 (in Russian).
2. Osipov I.N., Kopnin P.V. The main problems in the theory of diagnosis. Moscow, Medgiz Publ., 1951. 215 p. (in Russian).
3. Tetenev F.F. How to learn professional commentary clinical picture. Tomsk, Wizard, 2005. 173 p. (in Russian).
4. Propedevtika [Propaedeutics]. Bol'shaya Medicinskaya Enciklopediya [Great Encyclopedia of Medicine]. 3d ed. Moscow, Medicine Publ., 1972, vol. 7, pp. 141–152 (in Russian).
5. Tetenev F.F., Bodrova T.N., Kalinina O.V. Clinical reasoning, the formation and development. Klinicheskaya meditsina – Clinical Medicine, 2010, no. 5. pp. 70–71 (in Russian).
6. Tsaregorodcev G.I. Dialectical materialism and the theoretical foundations of medicine. Moscow, Medicine Publ., 1986. 288 p. (in Russian).
7. Tetenev F.F. New theory – in the twentieth century. 2nd ed. Tomsk, Wizard Publ., 2003. 212 p. (in Russian).
8. Tetenev FF, Bodrova TN Knowledge and reflections of a doctor in the process of clinical diagnosis. Byulleten' sibirskoy meditsiny – Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 2003, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–61 (in Russian).
9. Tetenev F.F., Bodrova T.N., Karzilov A.I. Lecture Tested survival knowledge among students. The Textbook for medical students. Tomsk, Publishing House of the Siberian State Medical University, 2008. 75 p. (in Russian).
10. Tetenev F.F., Bodrova T.N. Experience activate individual work of students at the Department of Internal Medicine Propaedeutics. Klinicheskaya meditsina – Clinical Medi-cine. 1988, no. 5, pp. 136–137 (in Russian).
11. Osipov I.N. Causes of diagnostic errors in pediatrics. Mos-cow, Medicine Publ., 1967. 148 p. (in Russian).
12. Propedevtika Internal Medicine. Ed. V.H. Vasilenko, A.L. Grebnev. 3rd ed. Moscow, Medicine Publ., 1982. 513 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Tetenev F.F., Bodrova T.N., Karzilov A.I., Tetenev K.F. WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2014;13(5):179-183. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2014-5-179-183
Views:
739
Email this article 