Preview

Bulletin of Siberian Medicine

Advanced search

Estimation of combined ex vivo effect of thermal ablation and vancomycin on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus culture

https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2025-3-5-13

Abstract

Aim. To study the ex vivo effect of high temperature exposure (55–56 °C) combined with vancomycin on culture behavior of pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).

Materials and methods. Liquid cultures of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain 43300 were heated ex vivo at 55–56 °C for 0–60 min, either with or without vancomycin (20 μg/ml), followed by incubation at 37 °C up to 120 min. A control suspension (100 or 250 microbial cells per 1 ml of isotonic saline) was maintained at 37 °C. Then, cultures were seeded on solid agar medium, and colony-forming units (CFU) were calculated using computer morphometry after 48h growth. Each experimental subgroup (growth control, thermal ablation, antibiotic, and thermal ablation + antibiotic) included at least three replicates.

Results. A semi-lethal heat exposure time (LD50) of 12.25 min was determined for a liquid microbial culture at 100 cells/ml. When the density was increased to 250 cells/ml, 30 min thermal ablation (55–56 °C) was insufficient for MRSA growth suppression. Vancomycin (20 μg/ml) alone did not affect CFU output. However, combined heat and antibiotic treatment resulted in 28% bacteriostatic effect (p < 0.001) on agar medium.

Conclusion. The study revealed a bacteriostatic effect of combined use of high-temperature exposure with vancomycin, which were ineffective when used separately. The obtained results have practical significance for reconstructive surgery of bone tissue, but require additional studies to clarify the mechanisms of the discovered phenomenon.

About the Authors

A. V. Gorokhova
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



T. F. Nasibov
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



L. S. Mushtovatova
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



O. P. Bochkareva
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



I. I. Anisenya
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (TUSUR); Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC), Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

40 Lenin Ave., 634050 Tomsk; 5 Kooperativny St., 634009 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



P. K. Sitnikov
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (TUSUR)
Russian Federation

40 Lenin Ave., 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



I. A. Khlusov
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU); Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (TUSUR); Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center (NRMC), Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk; 40 Lenin Ave., 634050 Tomsk; 5 Kooperativny St., 634009 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



U. A. Bariev
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



A. V. Leshenkova
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



A. Yu. Ryzhkova
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



D. O. Pakhmurin
Siberian State Medical University (SibSMU); Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (TUSUR)
Russian Federation

2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk; 40 Lenin Ave., 634050 Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article



References

1. Науменко З.С., Розова Л.В. Устойчивость Staphylococcus aureus к антибактериальным препаратам. Гений ортопедии. 2007;(2):36–38.

2. Божкова C.А., Тихилов Р.М., Краснова М.В., Рукина А.Н. Ортопедическая имплантат-ассоциированная инфекция: ведущие возбудители, локальная резистентность и рекомендации по антибактериальной терапии. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2013;19(4):5–15. DOI: 10.21823/23112905-2013-4-5-15.

3. Bozhkova S., Tikhilov R., Labutin D., Denisov A., Shubnyakov I., Razorenov V. et al. Failure of the first step of two-stage revision due to polymicrobial prosthetic joint infection of the hip. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2016;17(4):369–376. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-016-0417-8.

4. Masters E.A., Ricciardi B.F., Bentley K.L. de M., Moriarty T.F., Schwarz E.M., Muthukrishnan G. Skeletal infections: microbial pathogenesis, immunity and clinical management. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2022;20(7):385–400. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-022-00686-0.

5. Parvizi J., Gehrke T. International consensus group on periprosthetic joint infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1331. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009.

6. Manning L., Allen B., Davis J.S. Design Characteristics and Recruitment Rates for Randomized Trials of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection Management: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;12(10):1486. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101486.

7. He S.Y., Yu B., Jiang N. Current concepts of fracturerelated infection. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2023;2023:4839701. DOI: 10.1155/2023/4839701.

8. Rahim M.I., Rohde M., Rais B., Seitz J.M., Mueller P.P. Susceptibility of metallic magnesium implants to bacterial biofilm infections. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2016;104(6):1489–1499. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35680.

9. Craig W.A., Billeter M. et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adults summary of consensus recommendations from the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29(11):275–1279. DOI: 10.1592/phco.29.11.1275.

10. Bue M., Hanberg P., Koch J., Jensen L.K., Lundorff M., Aalbaek B. et al. Single-dose bone pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in a porcine implant-associated osteomyelitis model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research: Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 2018;36(4):1093–1098. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23776.

11. Palau M., Muñoz E., Larrosa N., Gomis X., Márquez E., Len O. et al. Hyperthermia prevents in vitro and in vivo biofilm formation on endotracheal tubes. Microbiology Spectrum. 2023;11(1):e0280722. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02807-22.

12. Шахов В.П., Хлусов И.А., Дамбаев Г.Ц., Зайцев К.В., Салмина (Егорова) А.Б., Шахова С.С. и др. Введение в методы культуры клеток, биоинженерии органов и тканей. Новосибирск: STT, 2004.

13. Prosolov K.A., Mitrichenko D.V., Prosolov A.B., Nikolaeva O.O., Lastovka V.V., Belyavskaya O.A. et al. Zn-doped CaP-based coatings on Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–6Al–7Nb alloys prepared by magnetron sputtering: controllable biodegradation, bacteriostatic, and osteogenic activities. Coatings. 2021;11(7):809. DOI: 10.3390/coatings11070809.

14. Korkmaz S., Göksülük D., Zararsiz G. MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. R JOURNAL. 2014;6(2):151–162. DOI: 10.32614/RJ-2014-031.

15. Pohlert T. PMCMRplus: Calculate pairwise multiple comparisons of mean rank sums extended. 2018. DOI: 10.32614/ CRAN.package.PMCMRplus.

16. Brunnermunzel package. RDocumentation. [Accessed 18th October 2024]. Available online: https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/brunnermunzel/versions/2.0.

17. Royston P. Remark AS R94: a remark on algorithm AS 181: the W-test for normality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics). 1995;44(4):547–551. DOI: 10.2307/2986146.

18. Munzel U., Brunner E. Nonparametric tests in the unbalanced multivariate one‐way design. Biometrical Journal. 2000;42(7):837–854. DOI: 10.1002/1521-4036(200011)42:7<837::AID-BIMJ837>3.0.CO;2-S.

19. Brunner E., Munzel U. The nonparametric behrens‐fisher problem: asymptotic theory and a small‐sample approximation. Biometrical Journal. 2000;42(1):17–25. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)15214036(200001)42:1<17::AID-BIMJ17>3.0.CO;2-U.

20. Karch J.D. Psychologists should use Brunner-Munzel’s instead of Mann-Whitney’s U test as the default nonparametric procedure. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2021;4. DOI: 10.1177/2515245921999602.

21. Noguchi K., Konietschke F., Marmolejo-Ramos F., Pauly M. Permutation tests are robust and powerful at 0.5% and 5% significance levels. Behavior Research Methods. 2021;53(6):2712–2724. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01595-5.

22. Elamir E. On uses of Van der Waerden test: a graphical approach. Preprint arXiv. 2022. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.02148.

23. Macunluoglu A.C., Ocakoğlu G. Comparison of the performances of non-parametric k-sample test procedures as an alternative to one-way analysis of variance. The European Research Journal. 2023;9(4) 687–696. DOI: 10.18621/eurj.1037546.

24. Luepsen H. Comparison of nonparametric analysis of variance methods: A vote for van der Waerden. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation. 2018;47(9):2547. DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2017.1353613.

25. Hirano R., Sakamoto Y., Kitazawa J., Yamamoto S., Tachibana N. Pharmacist-managed dose adjustment feedback using therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin was useful for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a single institution experience. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2016;9:243–252. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S109485.

26. Lehtinen S., Blanquart F., Croucher N.J., Turner P., Lipsitch M., Fraser C. Evolution of antibiotic resistance is linked to any genetic mechanism affecting bacterial duration of carriage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017;114(5):1075–1080. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617849114.

27. Sturtevant R.A., Sharma P., Pavlovsky L., Stewart E.J., Solomon M.J., Younger J.G. Thermal augmentation of vancomycin against staphylococcal biofilms. Shock (Augusta, Ga.). 2015;44(2):121–127. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000369.

28. Zhao Y., Peng X., Xu X., Wu M., Sun F., Xin Q. et al. Chitosan based photothermal scaffold fighting against bone tumor-related complications: Recurrence, infection, and defects. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2023;300:120264. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120264.


Review

For citations:


Gorokhova A.V., Nasibov T.F., Mushtovatova L.S., Bochkareva O.P., Anisenya I.I., Sitnikov P.K., Khlusov I.A., Bariev U.A., Leshenkova A.V., Ryzhkova A.Yu., Pakhmurin D.O. Estimation of combined ex vivo effect of thermal ablation and vancomycin on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus culture. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2025;24(3):5-13. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2025-3-5-13

Views: 530

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-0363 (Print)
ISSN 1819-3684 (Online)